User talk:Thomas Richard Harrison

Speedy deletion nomination of Wolfman Mac

A tag has been placed on Wolfman Mac, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 19:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wolfman Mac

The article Wolfman Mac has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable television character. No independent, reliable sources cited. Unable to independently verify. Possible self-promotion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Christine (novel), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 18:36, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Christine (novel). Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 19:56, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Christine (novel), you may be blocked from editing. keɪɑtɪk flʌfi (talk) 19:21, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]