User talk:ThomasMcLeod
November 2017
[edit]
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:MMR vaccine controversy. You have no evidence about why an article is "designed" as it is. Write dispassionately about the article content itself if you wish to participate here. See also the Wikipedia:Fringe theories content guideline. DMacks (talk) 04:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
@DMacks: Fair enough. Now please answer the question: Did the Nazis "design" a program to murder about six million Jews and others, or did it just happen that way? ThomasMcLeod (talk) 16:04, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Please don't compare anyone to nazis, wikipedia policy explicitly prohibits comparing editors to nazis. Tornado chaser (talk) 16:40, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Any more Nazi comparisons and you will be blocked. Acroterion (talk) 17:09, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oh my, @Acroterion: aren't we touchy. Did I compare any Wikipedia editor to Nazis? No I didn't. I asked a question about obviousness of intent. But, if you are so certain that I violated the rules, why wait? What's the hesitation?
Notice
[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.