User talk:ThomasKsock
You may contest this block by adding the text
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.ThomasKsock (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did not abuse nothing with this account !! --ThomasKsock (talk) 06:30, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Yes, you evaded the block of ThomasK (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Sandstein 06:47, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Then why did you create this account only 30 minutes ago? –MuZemike 06:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
I would suggest that you abandon this account and go back to your ThomasK account. The blocking administrator has reset the block so that you can edit your talk page. I still doubt that you will be unblocked, due to your outburst from earlier, but creating sockpuppets is the worst possible thing you can do right now, as it will make it far less likely that you can be unblocked. Sodam Yat (talk) 07:02, 25 March 2010 (UTC)