User talk:Thisipwasrecentlyusedbyvndl

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chimping, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chimping was changed by Thisipwasrecentlyusedbyvndl (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-06-19T18:22:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:22, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Trammell & Margaret Crow Collection of Asian Art. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Trammell & Margaret Crow Collection of Asian Art was changed by Thisipwasrecentlyusedbyvndl (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-06-19T18:23:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:23, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Alpesh Vadher, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Alpesh Vadher was changed by Thisipwasrecentlyusedbyvndl (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-06-19T18:23:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:23, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Alpesh Vadher. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Happysailor ^(Talk) 18:24, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to User talk:ClueBot Commons. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. — Jeff G. ツ 18:28, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thisipwasrecentlyusedbyvndl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't vandalise any more pages after being told not to.

Decline reason:

You haven't done anything but vandalize. Toddst1 (talk) 18:34, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thisipwasrecentlyusedbyvndl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not vandalise again after being told not to and I know fully understand what I am being blocked for and I will not repeat that behavior or otherwise disrupt Wikipedia again and I will make productive contributions instead to Wikipedia, also I looked at other users whom had been blocked for vandalism and they had been given many warnings about sandboxes, also I am new to Wikipedia so I just wanted to 'try it out'.

Decline reason:

Ah yes, the warnings. Perhaps you would remember you received them if you didn't blank your page. Perhaps you should have considered that blanking 4 pages in 4 minutes is vandalism, equal for your other edits. Your not a new editor at all by the way, since you seem quite proficient adding warning templates minutes after creating your account. Request declined, and talk page access revoked as well. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:18, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.