User talk:Thinkingmakesitso

Thinkingmakesitso, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Thinkingmakesitso! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:08, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Unemployed Philosophers Guild (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hasteur was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Unemployed Philosophers Guild and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Unemployed Philosophers Guild, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hasteur (talk) 01:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Unemployed Philosophers Guild (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Waggie was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

VERY close.. The recent addition of content summarized from reliable sources helps considerably from where it was before. I'd say that one, maybe two, more sources that aren't interviews and have more comprehensive coverage would do it. In fact, I would suggest removing some of the content sourced from interviews, as interviews are primary sources and don't provide enough secondary balance to the article. Some of the other sources are good, but Unemployed Philosopher's Guild is only mentioned as a sidenote in them, which is useful in an article, but not for establishing notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Unemployed Philosophers Guild and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Unemployed Philosophers Guild, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waggie (talk) 06:00, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Unemployed Philosophers Guild concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Unemployed Philosophers Guild, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Unemployed Philosophers Guild

Hello, Thinkingmakesitso. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Unemployed Philosophers Guild".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:53, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COI check for The Unemployed Philosophers Guild

Hello, do you have any connections to this company? It seems that most of your recent edits relate to it. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:06, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I do have a connection; I work there. A few years ago I was working to create the article and was instructed that I needed just one more primary source. I returned to the venture recently since we had multiple more primary sources. I had also marked it somehow so it was clear I had a relation to the company, but could not find that this time around.

I believe that the entry meets Wikipedia's threshold, and it certainly exceeds the standard I was given a few years ago when I was told I needed one more source. If there is something more I need to provide please let me know. If it's still possible to mark that I as a user have a relation to the company I'm happy to do that as well. Thinkingmakesitso (talk) 17:15, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Unemployed Philosophers Guild moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Unemployed Philosophers Guild, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:19, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Unemployed Philosophers Guild (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 97198 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Unemployed Philosophers Guild and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

97198 (talk) 01:29, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]