User talk:Thevictorator95

Welcome!

Hi, Thevictorator95. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 17:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daisy Robinton (September 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fuortu was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daisy Robinton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fuortu (talk) 15:12, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thevictorator95, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fuortu (talk) 15:12, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Daisy Robinton

Hello, Thevictorator95. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Daisy Robinton".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 07:45, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Transvaro. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 17:21, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Those edits were not vandalism... The page has 3 different issues as mentioned by the banners, and I solely address those issues : Turned catalog-like lists into short descriptions, adding a bunch of sourced content (it was hard to find), removed primary sources because sometimes they're perceived as SEO, I do not see what is vandalism there... Let me take this discussion to the related page's discussion area. --Thevictorator95 (talk) 17:31, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Transvaro

Pls do not removed the source even they are primary. You could subsitute the source with secondary if you can find them.

-- CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 17:23, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, I thought it was a productive way forward, but OK. --Thevictorator95 (talk) 17:26, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited StoreDot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daimler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Global Goods Partners, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Friday (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited True Freedom Trust, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holy Trinity Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:11, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tulsi Gabbard, you may be blocked from editing. This edit which you labelled "format" was actually adding an unreliable source making controversial claims about a living person. SummerPhD^v2.0 03:12, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are clearly overreacting and over-defensive for nothing. Just undo anything I did wrong and go bark somewhere else. Threatening users based on so little is something you could get blamed for though, so please behave. --Thevictorator95 (talk) 02:05, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please ensure that your edit summaries accurately reflect the changes you have made.

In all articles and especially in regard to living persons, do not site unreliable sources, especially those making sensational claims of a speculative nature.

BLP concerns are not "nothing". As Wikipedia policy stipulates, I immediately removed contentious material about a living person citing an unreliable source. Further, I provided the consensus warning (above). That you feel this is "clearly overreacting and over-defensive for nothing" seems to indicate you do not understand the nature of the problem. If you have similar problems in the future, you will receive further warnings and/or be blocked from editing, at the discretion of the administrator(s) involved. - SummerPhD^v2.0 15:51, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I added one link and I didn't know it was disruptive. That accidentally happens a 1000 times everyday on Wikipedia. I'll report you if you keep harassing me for this. Frankly I've read stuff about her anti-homosexual stand in the past: did I disrupt the page with this easy shot? No. Did I start an edit war when you undid my edits? No. So keep cool and move along, and I won't touch your precious page anymore which I barely edited. Geeez... --Thevictorator95 (talk) 01:29, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Colonization of Antarctica

Hi Thevictorator95. I removed a portion of your edits to Colonization of Antarctica, and am very concerned about this contribution in light of the discussion above: User_talk:Thevictorator95#September_2019. Are you familiar with WP:RSP? Do you know that you can search WP:RSN when you're uncertain about the reliability of a source? --Ronz (talk) 20:07, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No I was not aware of WP:RSP, thank you! --Thevictorator95 (talk) 05:50, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Advisory Committee on Antarctic Names, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:09, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Burnout Syndromes

Hello, Thevictorator95,

Thank you for creating Burnout Syndromes.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Additional references are required to establish notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 04:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I will check if I can improve it. I discovered the band when I was listening music by streaming, but I didn't find so much info about them in English. Most of the info is in Japanese.--Thevictorator95 (talk) 08:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added some references. You can check if it's enough to establish notability.--Thevictorator95 (talk) 05:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wheaton Precious Metals Updates

Hi Thevictorator95,

I see that you are an active member of Wikipedia and have updated Franco Nevada's page recently. I am looking for someone to help me update the information on the Wheaton Precious Metals page, I unfortunately cannot as there is a conflict of interest. The information on the Wheaton page is very out of date, i've highlighted potential changes below:

The key information box on the right incorrectly has Wheaton listed on the Frankfurt stock exchange, this should be removed and replaced with the London Stock Exchange (the company listed on 28th October 2020, link to the press release here: https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/WPM/admission-to-trading-on-the-main-market-of-the-lse/14734411).

The article has the wrong President & CEO. Randy Smallwood is the President and CEO and Douglas Holtby is the Chairman of the Board, please see a link to the management team here: https://www.wheatonpm.com/Company/management-and-directors/default.aspx

The financial info is from 2013 in the grey box at the top of the article. As of 2020 half year results they now sit at:

Revenue US$247.954 mil (2020) Net income US$105.812 mil (2020) Total assets US$180.275 mil (2020) Total equity US$5.516 (2020)

Please see their half year 2020 results here for reference: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/WPM/news/5644243550442243/Wheaton_Precious_Metals_Announces_Record_Revenue_and_Sales_Volumes_in_the_First_Half_of_2020

Would you be able to update this? I'm not sure what the Wikipedia guidelines are on this so please do let me know if this is not possible.

Best,

Annabel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 05ademorgan (talk • contribs) 10:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Annabel. I will check it and if it's not so much time consuming, I'll update it with reliable info. --Thevictorator95 (talk) 08:12, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ayoluengo oil field, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chevron.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:StoreDot logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:StoreDot logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Center for Urban Pedagogy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Center for Urban Pedagogy, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Urban Pedagogy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]