User talk:Thetruthhhh

Welcome!

Hello, Thetruthhhh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 14:21, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A summary of site policies and guidelines you may find useful

Please sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~, found next to the 1 key), and please do not alter other's comments.
Wikipedia is not a general discussion forum, additions to talk pages should be about improving the article within the guidelines, not voicing one's opinion on the subject matter.
"Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for. In the case of science, this evidence must ultimately start with physical evidence. In the case of religion, this means only reporting what has been written and not taking any stance on doctrine. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:21, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A note of basic history

The Bible a collection of multiple texts, the Torah is just the first five books of the Bible. The Bible was compiled into a single canon in the early 4th century at latest (and that's ignoring the rather similar canons that were around before the first Council of Nicea such as those of Irenaeus or Origen, and completely skipping over the earlier establishment of the Hebrew Bible). The Quran was compiled in the mid 7th century at earliest, so, obviously the Bible could not have taken material from the Quran unless you believe either Uthman, Ali, or Constantine had a time machine. The "Korah" you mentioned about seems to only be a corruption of an outdated spelling of Quran (Koran).

Please actually learn about history before posting about it. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:21, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Doctor Eggman because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 01:42, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Multicultural London English has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Multicultural London English was changed by Thetruthhhh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963347 on 2015-01-12T23:58:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 03:03, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]