User talk:Thespian/Archive3

Request for Copy of Deleted article: Jack Petricone and Will Petricone

My articles, "Jack Petricone," and "Will Petricone" were deleted on Tuesday, September 23, the same day it was created. Could you please post copies on my talk page or [1] thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jedijbp (talk • contribs) 00:50, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for copy of deleted article: Teresa Sue Bratton

Hello,

My article, "Teresa Sue Bratton," was deleted on Friday (Aug. 22), the same day it was created. Could you please post a copy of this article to my talk page or email it to me? Thank you for your help.

Sincerely, Rootsdj (talk) 00:30, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DreamGuy 2

Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DreamGuy 2. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DreamGuy 2/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DreamGuy 2/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, David Mestel^(Talk) 20:17, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you've nothing to add to your statement, I wouldn't bother - it's much more likely to be read as a statement than as an evidence submission. It might be a good idea to append a note to your statement saying that it contains all the evidence you wish to submit. David Mestel^(Talk) 20:23, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Madeline L'Engle

Ah damn, thanks for catching my mistake. It's sad (and frustrating) that L'Engle doesn't even get her own obituary page... Cheers, CP 17:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article Rescue Squadron image

I really like it. Could you possibly fit it into a userbox somehow? You might need to remove the words. Ichormosquito 18:32, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of catchphrase used in Grey's Anatomy

Hello! I've just userfied this article so you can check to see whatever content can be merged with the main article. Here's the link

When you're done you can request a db-author if you want or you can keep if you still need for further edits/merging--JForget 23:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist

Thank you. ClemRutter 08:05, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't an Admin?

Why not? -- llywrch 20:32, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thespian -- So you want my imperfect opinion about whether you have achieved enough points (yeah, everyone calls them edits -- but in reality, everyone wants to know with a minimum of effort whether they are the right edits) to pass a vote for Adminship.

First, I have to warn you that as one of the few Wikipedians around who are still contributing actively after almost five years, my opinions on what qualifies one to be an Admin are -- how would some folks put it? Old-fashioned? Archaic? I do have certain numerical goals I think every Admin should meet, but only to prove that they have the necessary exposure & experience with the Wikipedia culture to make good calls as an Admin: 3 months, 500 edits, no derogatory information on them (e.g., no blocks or bans). Oh, & that they want to be an Admin: there are a few Wikipedians whom I thin would make fine Admins, but they've made it clear that they don't want the Admin bit.

Then, there is the problem that some people I think would make fine Admins, who want the added responsibilities, failed their RfA vote. Because of that, I wonder if the whole Admin process isn't out of whack, & weighted too heavily towards Wikipedians who fight vandals, revert spammers & slap down troublemakers. If the clique that hangs out at WP:RfA prefers policemen over janitors. After all, Admins don't deal with crowd control -- we all do, & if someone won't obide by community standards then then we leave it to the ArbCom to handle them.But that last part is my own personal opinion about how Wikipedia currently fucntions, & if the mechanism is broken, then we need to intentionally & overtly change the mechanism to fix it.

Anyway, back to your question. Obviously, you pass my criteria, & if it were up to me you'd be an Admin as fast as the servers could update the edit. More importantly, I took a long, careful look at your edit history, & found that I liked what I saw: you talked to people, you tried to be dispassionate about conflicts, your priority was to improve content, rather than to score points with many trivial edits or fight vandalism & other bad guys. There is the problem of a low total edit score -- which I mention because another Wikipedian whom I thought would be a shoo-in had more than twice as many edits as you, yet failed his RfA candidacy -- but if the fact that you've been active only since February/March of this year were emphasized, I think the number of edits should be a non-issue.

I saw that you were involved in the recent DreamGuy RFC -- but IMHO you acted more as a mediating voice, not one of those looking to force some kind of summary decision on his behavior. I think that moderating tone is someting in your favor. (Then again, from having dealt with the guy I've come to a negative opinion about him, so maybe I'm wrong there.) You also wrote an article for the Signpost -- which shows your thoughts about Wikipedia in a manner few other candidates have done. (If writing an article for the Signpost were a requirement to become an Admin, I think Ral315 might have an easier time of finding copy.) Lastly, the fact you want these priviledges for a very specific purpose -- to cleanup the backlog at MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist -- is a good thing: I think it's fair to assume that the general reaction to anyone who wants to be an Admin "just because" is one of suspicion. Yes, having the title a wonderful validation that a given person is a valued contributor to Wikipedia, but too many people see it as being more than just that.

So after all of this verbage, I bet you wonder what I suggest you do. The short answer is that it's up to you: nominating yourself (or being nominated) for Adminship is a roll of the dice. Had you twice as many edits since February of this year, I believe it would be a no-brainer. But your situation is a bit more iffy, & I'd hate to see you try, fail & become disillusioned with Wikipedia because you've done some important things. One thing you may want to do is contact another Admin or two for their opinions. I notice you worked with Alison and Ral315 recently: you may want to ask their opinion on the matter. Another Admin to contact would be Durova: she has a good head on her shoulders, & I think she'd give you a straight answer. Feel free to ask any or all of these folks in email, if you want to keep the matter confidential. After all of that, if you still want to be an Admin, let me know. I'd be happy to nominate you -- or just add my cote/opinion. -- llywrch 22:49, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is something of a bias against folks who self-nominate, so why risk it? -- llywrch 23:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FOF IP Block

Hi Thespian, please check AIN (FOF IP Block). I replied to your comment. Thanks! Mfantoni 05:35, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Cosentino

On 28 October, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chris Cosentino, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 18:57, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Did you receive my email? Please respond. -- llywrch 22:30, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gavin Kaysen

On 31 October, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gavin Kaysen, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—Wknight94 (talk) 14:28, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:I appreciate your comments

You are welcome. :) About moving the discussion to the talk page, though I agree that the scope is much larger than your RfA, it is also very pertinent. I feel that, as an RfA page is a discussion page anyway, all discussion should be kept on the main page so that there is maximum participation (unless of course the discussion becomes so huge or irrelevant as to make it disruptive on the main RfA page). So I would prefer that it stays where it is, but if you or any other individual moves it to the talk page, I'm fine with it and won't object. The discussion has gone to Jmlk17's talk page anyway (thanks to you :) and I may continue it there. - TwoOars (Rev) 17:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Always appreciate another culinarian

Would love to meet up sometime. However, gastronomy for us at BU is more of a liberal arts approach with no culinary aspect to it Ie. history, anthropology, economics, etc. I on the other hand have worked with many of the techniques used in Molecular gastronomy and would love to chat about it sometime. If you are working with sous-vide, you should really consider getting a temperature controlled water circulator as well. It will help keep the temperature when going for long-term cooking processes, such as cooking a steak to a perfect 110 degrees, which could take up to an hour. In a pot on the stove, you lose that control.

As for the newsletter, up until now I have kept it very project oriented, especially because I am so bogged down with school work and working on articles, the last thing I generally want to do is write yet another thing from my chaotic brain into a newsletter. Your idea seems great though and I think it would fit in well and make the newsletter a little less "business" like, with a bit of fun to it. I agree it would help others potentially cite information as well, I slightly cringe at people not getting the information directly from the book itself though. I am open to the idea though and think we should go ahead with it. If you want contact me on my e-mail which is on my main page. I'd like to keep personal conversations off of Wikipedia. Talk to you soon.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 02:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter November 2007

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter November 2007
--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 04:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Random question, unrelated to everything except your username

What sort of thespian are you? On-stage, back-stage, both... I'm always surprised at the number of theatre people I run into on here. :)

Also, completely random, you could put {{Rfa-notice}} on your userpage to provide a handy-dandy link to your RfA. EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gavin's hook

You'll find it on this template, third from the bottom. The hook read:

...that Gavin Kaysen was undone at the Bocuse d'Or cooking competition because a dishwasher ate part of his entry?

Enjoy :) GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 17:21, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Love your Next Iron Chef edits

I haven't heard from you since you message and would love to talk to you. How did your sous-vide experiment go? I made some greyure cheese "caviar" tonight that I put on top of a country pate with a raspberry foam.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 06:47, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Morou Ouattara, was selected for DYK!

On November 3, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Morou Ouattara, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 (talk) 18:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

I'm pleased to inform you that, consensus having been achieved, you are now an administrator. Please read all the material on the administrators' reading list before testing out your new privileges. For instructions, please see the administrators' how-to guide. Best of luck — Dan | talk 23:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yay! -- llywrch 02:13, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected? Probably. Doesn't mean I don't know a good admin candidate when I see one and endorse the proposal accordingly. Congratulations! -Dustin —C.Fred (talk) 03:48, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, and thank you for the message. I am not always right, but I am very confident I was right on this issue. Let me know if you ever need any help. Best wishes, --John 04:52, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well done, and good luck! And thank you for reading the talk page header and putting your message in the right place :) Neil ☎ 11:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Remembrance...

--nat ^{Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?!} 03:41, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

Good job there gurlie, sorry I haven't e-mailed you in the last couple days. Been a really busy weekend preparing for classes this week. I should be a bit more settled down tomorrow. --Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 05:38, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Congrats!

Congrats on passing RfA :) If you need anything, feel free to ask! A couple suggestions: Wikipedia:IRC channels/wikipedia-en-admins, is an IRC channel, for admins on the english wikipedia. The folks there are generally plenty patient, and, were great at helping out the newb, at least in my case :) (However, you have to request permission, see the page I linked to). Also, a couple very helpful scripts to have as an admin... Twinkle (for block notices etc), and, CSD AutoReason, which is immensely helpful, in deleting thigs, it gives you a menu of CSD reasons... There's also This, which does the same for protection, also extremely helpful! :)

Anyhow, best of luck, and, if you need anything, feel free to ask :) SQL ^{Query me!} 05:50, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Best of luck. All hands on deck next week! Bearian 13:52, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good job, Ms Admin

Congrats on the successful RfA, from one foodie to another.

- Jeremy (Jerem43 05:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Cancon

Hey! It was me who started The Western Investor article, and brought it to Bearcat's attention when whuzzizname was insisting on deleting it! Anyway, I am delighted to see your success at RfA and was happy to offer support. Congrats, --Paul Erik 13:07, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About your RfA

Congratulations on your successful request for adminship. I am glad you passed, and you are welcome for the support. For information on using your new tools, see the school for new admins; you will find it very useful. Good luck! Acalamari 17:59, 6 November 2007 (UTC) Acalamari 17:59, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations from me too. Best of luck! PeaceNT 13:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm late! And I'm happy for you! I am sure you will do well and (continue to) be a boon to the project. =) ··coela can 05:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Protection Toronto

Hi there. I'd just like to ask why you protected the Toronto article. As far as I can tell it hasn't been the subject of sustained vandalism or edit warring of late, just a couple of minor vandalism on a popular article and some good faith edits that weren't suitable. Ben W Bell talk 21:43, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay, it's not really a problem and I didn't want to step on another admin's toes by unprotecting it. I was just curious that's all. Well have a good day and good editing. Ben W Bell talk 12:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats and request

Congratulations on your Adminship! Since you are an administrator I have a request to make a completely harmless edit in the Battle of Jenin article. It is currently locked because of disputes so I can't do it. "It" is adding the Fatah flag to the combatants section of the infobox in place of the Fatah logo. Whenever you have time may you please do that favor for me and of course the article. Cheers! --Al Ameer son 09:01, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thats alright, I understand where you're coming from. Thanks anyway! --Al Ameer son 17:21, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kindle article

Sorry, I completely missed your comment on the Suggestions page last week. If you still want to write an article on the Kindle, feel free to for next week's issue. For what it's worth, I've never rejected a well-written story on any subject, so if you think you've got an interesting article, go ahead and write it -- don't worry about my approval :) Ral315 » 06:12, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter December 2007

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter Decemberr 2007
--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 22:36, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Korean cuisine

Hey, can you move the cuisine template to the bottom of the Korean cuisine article when you get a chance, pleeeease.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC (talk) 00:54, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you administrator lady!!!--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC (talk) 03:32, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

R3-30

Hey Thespian. Craig Norris reads your letter again, this time on their year-end "Top 100" show. How cool is that? Well done! --Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 21:17, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notice re Corinna Fugate

Corinna Fugate

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Corinna Fugate, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Corinna Fugate. Orange Mike | Talk 18:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter January 2008

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter January 2008
--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC (talk) 05:37, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A request for your consideration regarding CAT:AOTR

...My guinea pigs and the "A"s through "S"s having felt this message was OK to go forward with (or at least not complained bitterly to me about it :) ), today it's the turn of the "T"s through "Z"s (and beyond, apparently)! I'm hoping that more of you chaps/chapettes will point to their own criteria instead of mine :)... it's flattering but a bit scary! :) Also, you may want to check back to the table periodically, someone later than you in the alphabet may have come up with a nifty new idea. ++Lar: t/c 20:53, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

fair use images on user page

Just looking around, and I found the Target logo on your user page, which is a fair use logo allowed only in the Target Corporation article. Please read Wikipedia:Removal of fair use images. --Geopgeop (T) 17:04, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Corinna Fugate

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Corinna Fugate, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Corinna Fugate. Not trying to go behind your back or anything, so I waited longer than a month. Orange Mike | Talk 22:04, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify

What article are you talking about? (Or are you talking about my deletion process in general?) --Orange Mike | Talk 18:47, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Anywhere but here alternate.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Anywhere but here alternate.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:23, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Article

On February 1, 2008, the article entitled Gameplasma was deleted. As you are one of the admins on the list for getting the text for review, I was wondering if there was a way I could see the article because I think that either it was wrongly deleted, or I can fix it to make it acceptable. I'm not quite sure what I should do as far as this matter is concerned, so I figured I would just ask you.

Awaiting reply, --GPJCollins (talk) 19:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC)GPJCollins[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Western investor show.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Western investor show.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [2], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Western investor show.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 00:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Western investor street.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Western investor street.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [3], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Western investor street.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 00:11, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter June 2008

--Chef Tanner (talk) 17:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Thanks for the message, I noticed you have slowed down on editing yourself lately, how are things out there?--Chef Tanner (talk) 00:19, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Computer generated imagery

...exists. Please help to improve this Portal - the scope is anything that is generated on computer without a sensor. The Topics section is the only part at first draft. If you can help with anything - collecting images for the "More pictures" gallery, good articles, heck, even the intro needs a rewrite or three, please tuck in. See you there. Dhatfield (talk) 21:30, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter July 2008

--Chef Tanner (talk) 15:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Independence Day!

As you are a nice Wikipedian, I just wanted to wish you a happy Independence Day! And if you are not an American, then have a happy day and a wonderful weekend anyway! :) Your friend and colleague, --Happy Independence Day! Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 03:45, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hi. I was browsing through the members of the Wikiproject Food and Drink and noticed that you were interested in chef-type biographies, and then saw that you do copyedits. I'm planning to nominate the Nigella Lawson article for FA, but having already promoted the Elaine Paige article, one of the things that slowed the nomination down was the fact I didn't already have a copyedit done. If you could perhaps find the time to do a copyedit of the Nigella article, I would be really grateful. I did leave a request at the WikiProject Food and Drink but it seems to have been overlooked maybe. If you simply do not have the time, then no worries at all. Best regards, Eagle Owl (talk) 14:35, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your offer. I've really been busy outside of Wikipedia lately, so admittedly I've been uable to pay the article much attention at all, but I should be back fully on Wikipeida soon. Thanks. Eagle Owl (talk) 12:47, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Drama Adjudicators

Hello, you are listed in the Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles. I wonder if you can help me. An article I created, Guild of Drama Adjudicators, was deleted before I had a chance to address the reason for its deletion (this may have had something to do wit me deleting the speedy deletion notice in error - genuinely - I thought it was an infringement of copyright notice and after I addressed the concerns I deleted the notice - a breach of etiquette I now know (although I did inform the notifier)). Anyway, I admit that I did not do the article justice. It was one that I put together very quickly in order to improve later and I should have used my user space to do this. In a way, I am glad I have been forced to revisit it. Could you please restore the page to my user area in order that I can make it a more substantial article.Kwib (talk) 16:35, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiad for Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron?

See: Template:Wikipedia-adnavbox

I notice you created a really excellent image for Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron

Would you be interested in making a wiki-ad for Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron? Thanks. Ikip (talk) 00:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Corinna Fugate

I happened across this page as I was new page patrolling (a new page on Rose Mercury had been redirected). I see that you have made a fairly impassioned plea to Ms Fugate's fans to go carefully with her page to assure that it doesn't get deleted again. However, I can see nothing in the citations to indicate that this artist has reached the level of notability required by WP:MUSIC. The citations in her article are to 1) local "puff" pieces; 2) self-published sites or 3) blogs and youtube pages by Fugate herself. If you can explain her notability, I'd be glad to listen. But otherwise, I'm thinking Afd. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 22:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]