User talk:Thesamuelclemens

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of TheEdgarBox (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:13, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thesamuelclemens (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no idea why a user claimed that I am a sockpuppet. One of the rationales was that because another user had a literary reference as their username, and we edited the same page, that I am a sockpuppet. This is really preposterous. Just because we both have a literary username is not evidence of sockpuppetry, and I'm surprised it was used successfully as a justification to block me. I was trying to clean the page up because I am a fan of dennis hopper the photographer. Please reinstate my account, I am fully aware of the rules and will not break any.

Decline reason:

You share an IP address with the TheEdgarBox which leads me to think you are the same person. PhilKnight (talk) 02:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thesamuelclemens (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I live in New York City in a very crowded residential area, so it is possible that somebody else nearby or using the same building wifi shares my address. Please lift the ban, I won't break any rules.

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. The technical evidence is unambiguous. Yamla (talk) 13:43, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.