User talk:Thesabrerattler

Welcome

Hello Thesabrerattler and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! User:UW Dawgs (talk) 20:29, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. UW Dawgs (talk) 19:56, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note, your edits regardless of via registered User or IP do not appear on the article. The article has been protected because of the ongoing disruptive editing. UW Dawgs (talk) 19:56, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

Hello, Thesabrerattler, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. UW Dawgs (talk) 19:58, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple emails

I have two, jjimjackson992@gmail.com and jjackson26@austin.rr.com, but to my knowledge I have only posted from jjimjackson992@gmail.com Thesabrerattler (talk) 22:11, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Red River Showdown

Hey Thesabrerattler! ~ Nice to meet you. I understand your frustration with the article and the way it is written ~ maybe this can help you understand the WP:consensus ~ Red River Showdown championship game Talk page. Once again nice to meet you and let me know here on your talk page if I can help you in any way. ~mitch~ (talk) 22:50, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Red River Showdown shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~mitch~ (talk) 20:37, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

3R warning re Red River Showdown

Your recent editing history at Red River Showdown shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Please discuss at Talk:Red River Showdown where this exact issue has been recently discussed and current consensus reached (note, consensus can change). If you believe any nuance was missed in the prior discussions, other editors can engage with you based on your Talk comments to resolve. UW Dawgs (talk) 16:09, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ~mitch~ (talk) 23:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]