User talk:Thermaland~enwiki
|
If you could
[edit]I noticed you applied some insight to a Spirou album the other day, and see your French should be up to snuff. I've been trying to get a bunch of them out, and with the speed and my very limited French, things have not been too thorough, so if you find yourself looking for a distraction, it would be cool if you could look over some of my language crime.. Anything in Category:Spirou et Fantasio albums needs a keen eye. MURGH disc. 04:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hiya, yes I'll see what I can do. As it were I recently acquired the entire run of S&F books by Franquin so it's all fairly fresh in my mind.... :) Also I'm not terribly busy at work this month. ;) Thermaland 15:56, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
M.Labarbe
[edit]Hi. Have you used your language skillz to get to the bottom of why so many are calling the Maire Gustave Labarbe when Franquin never did? And if not, could you? It's the sort of mystery that really should have an explanation. My current theory is that someone else in Spirou, some funny text people (possibly one Jadoul [1]) is responsible. Still curious? MURGH disc. 03:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hello I completely forgot about this, sorry? Will see what I can do. Thermaland 22:20, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
F. Fillon
[edit]Hi, I've restored the reference to Fillon's anglophilia. I think you make some very thoughtful and useful contributions to Wikipedia, but with respect I think you are incorrect on this occasion. You took out the anglophile reference because you said it seems to come from his Welsh wife. Why so? He could be married to a Chinese wife (or, for that matter, a French wife) and still be an anglophile. Looking at it one way, his anglophilia - which is specifically cited in the source story from the Guardian - and his Welsh marriage are two completely different facets of his UK connections. Looking at it another way, anglophilia is often used as a catch-all, rightly or wrongly, to describe a regard for things British, not just things English. Moreover, the part of Wales from where Mme Fillon hails is the traditional county of Monmouthshire, which for centuries until 1974 had a somewhat ambiguous status between Wales and England, being considered a part of England in all aspects of lawmaking, and even today is regarded as the most English part of Wales. But even looking at the reference in this second way, Fillon's Anglophilia does not have to derive from his marriage. It's a chicken-and-egg situation: did Fillon meet his wife through his regard for the UK, or did he develop his regard for the UK following his marriage? Or are the two things just coincidence? The sequence doesn't matter anyway - the Guardian story mentioned the two things equally and separately and so I cited both aspects equally. I stand by that. Kind regards from Gervius, a Francophile Brit! Gervius 14:16, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hi there. You make valid points. Well I won't change it back as I don't feel very strongly about it, but it seems to me that it should either be expanded on or not included. You know how journalists stick random labels and imaginary nicknames on politicians on whom they know nothing and then it gets repeated at nauseam? I smell something like that. Having said that I don't know much about Fillon, but we are likely to see many profiles of him in the press in the next few days, which might clarify the matter one way or the other... Regards.Thermaland 14:35, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hi again and thanks for your reply. I do take your point about lazy journalists parrotting labels they've read somewhere else - sometimes on Wikipedia, it seems! - and I've amended the reference to reflect that. All the best again, Gervius 20:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- It appears that there is something to is after all and I was wrong! In fact there is a whole story behind it: according to a profile, Fillon's father hated Britain since the war and the man himself discovered the country late in life and liked it etc... Fillon has also spent a couple of days at 10 Downing St in preparation for office, as he's interested in the Blair team's managerial style. So I've removed the emphasis on the Guardian in the paragraph as that's rather clunky and there is a reference. Thermaland 10:02, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Lord Ahmed
[edit]I think you misunderstood a part of a sentence I put in. The part you deleted was taken from news sources. It is not my point of view. Lord Ahmed's criticism of Rushdie's knighthood was because Rushdie had been a vehement critique of Islam. Perhaps my grammar could have been better.
I quote from the Evening Standard:
Labour's Lord Ahmed expressed surprise at the decision to give a knighthood to Rushdie, who was placed under a fatwa, or death sentence, by Iranian leader Ayatollah Khomeini 18 years ago after the publication of the allegedly blasphemous The Satanic Verses.
"I was appalled to hear Salman Rushdie had been given a knighthood," Lord Ahmed said.
"Two weeks ago the Prime Minister was calling for building relations between the Muslim world and Britain, then suddenly this knighthood is given to a man who has not only been abusive to Muslims, but also to Christians - because he used abusive language towards Jesus Christ."
He said whoever had made the decision had made Gordon Brown's job very difficult as he takes over as Prime Minister.
"The confidence that was being built within Britain with inter-faith work and community cohesion work has once again been damaged because of this provocative decision.
"This man not only provoked violence around the world because of his writings, but there were many people who were killed around the world.
"Forgiving and forgetting is one thing, but honouring the man who has blood on his hands, sort of, because of what he did, I think is going a bit too far."
Daily Telegraph:
"However, the Muslim peer, Labour's Lord Ahmed, told BBC Radio 4's PM that he was "appalled" to hear of a knighthood for "a man who has not only been abusive to Muslims, but also to Christians".
Custodiet ipsos custodes talk 14:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Hello. I think it's still POV even if it's not your POV! To be honest I don't own the Satanic Verses but from the extracts I remember at the time it was not "a criticism of Islam", it was a piece of fiction that took some liberties some people objected to. It was not criticism, it was fiction which is a different thing. By using the word critique the article endorses the attacks, I feel. Thermaland 07:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
July 2007
[edit]
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Madeleine Bunting: You may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. I'm with you, this shouldn't be happening — but if you warn vandals, then they can be blocked for long enough for them to be taken out of the equation. Angus Lepper(T, C, D) 16:52, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hello, thanks. What happened was that someone posted a call on a blog for people to come and vandalise this page, so I thought warnings would be pointless in such a case and I requested semi-protection instead (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Madeleine_Bunting_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29). I am a bit of a novice to this side of Wikipedia actually, so please let me know if I should have put a template on the page there as well or instead. I've seen talk pages for IP addresses before where there are 30 "last warnings" piled up and it seems silly.Thermaland 17:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I actually saw your request for page protection and headed to the article to just check the history to see if there was any more vandalism to revert. The reason that IPs in particular have multiple last warnings is because they can be dynamic — that is, the same person doesn't use the same IP all the time (depends on the ISP, type of connection, etc!) and so warnings older than a couple of days are often disregarded (although it depends on the exact circumstances — for example if an IP is known to be registered to one specific user or organisation, then it will be treated much like a standard username). I get your point about not warning users in this case, but it's always worth a try, just in case they do go too far. Incidentally (I don't know if you know this or not, but you saw you're a new user so it's worth saying), if you do come across someone who has vandalised after a last warning, then just simply post a report at Administrator Intervention Against Vandalism like {{vandal|usernamehere}} — explanation of report here or {{vandalIP|ipaddresshere}} — explanation of report here. HTH! Angus Lepper(T, C, D) 17:31, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
London Meetup - January 12, 2008
[edit]Hi! There's going to be a London Wikipedia Meetup coming Saturday January 12, 2008. If you are interested in coming along take part in the discussion over at Wikipedia:Meetup/London7. The discussion is going on until tomorrow evening and the official location and time will be published at the same page late Thursday or early Friday. Hope to see you Saturday, Poeloq (talk) 02:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Invitation to Wikipedia meetup in London
[edit]
Date: 13:00 onwards, Sunday 10 August 2008
Venue: Penderel's Oak pub, Holborn WC1 map
More information: Wikipedia:Meetup/London 12
Hello,
I noticed that you have listed yourself as a Wikipedian in London, so I thought you might like to come to one of our monthly social meetups. The next one is going to be on Sunday 10 August, which might well be rather short notice, but if you can't come this time, we try to have one every second Sunday of the month.
If you haven't been before, these meetups are mainly casual social events for Wikipedia enthusiasts in which we chat about Wikipedia and any other topics we fancy. It's a great way to meet some very keen Wikipedians, but we'd also love for you to come along if you're interested in finding out more about Wikipedia, other Wikimedia projects, or other collaborative wiki projects too.
The location is a pub that is quite quiet and family friendly on a Sunday lunchtime, so hopefully younger Wikipedians will also feel welcome and safe. Alcohol consumption is certainly not required!
Although the meetups are popular, many UK-based editors still don't know about them. It would be great to welcome some fresh faces, so I hope you can come along.
Yours,
James F. (talk) 09:27, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Please forgive the slightly impersonal mass-invite!
José Luis Munuera
[edit]For some rather weird reason the article about José Luis Munuera has been nominated for speedy (sic) deletion. Could you help me commenting on it on the talk page. --Oddeivind (talk) 22:20, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
London Wikimedia Fundraiser
[edit]Good evening! This is a friendly message from Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry, inviting you to the London Wikimedia Fundraising party on 19th December 2010, in approximately one week. This party is being held at an artistic London venue with room for approximately 300 people, and is being funded by Ed Saperia, a non-Wikipedian who has a reputation for holding exclusive events all over London. This year, he wants to help Wikipedia, and is subsidising a charity event for us. We're keen to get as many Wikimedians coming as possible, and we already have approximately 200 guests, including members of the press, and some mystery guests! More details can be found at http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/London - expect an Eigenharp, a mulled wine hot tub, a free hog roast, a haybale amphitheatre and more. If you're interested in coming - and we'd love to have you - please go to the ten.wikipedia page and follow the link to the Facebook event. Signing up on Facebook will add you to the party guestlist. Entry fee is a heavily subsidised £5 and entry is restricted to over 18s. It promises to be a 10th birthday party to remember! If you have any questions, please email me at chasemewiki at gmail.com.
Hope we'll see you there, (and apologies for the talk page spam) - Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 00:05, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
The Contribution Team cordially invites you to Imperial College London
 | For our first official recruitment drive! Starting on Wednesday the 9th of February at 12:30pm. We would love to have you! |
All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice... 11:59, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Thermaland. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Thermaland~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
03:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed
[edit]This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
19:39, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)