User talk:Theriwolf

Please unblock me

You're gonna have to come up with a better reason... —GFOLEY FOUR— 02:10, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theriwolf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for my nonconstructive edits. I was just joking around.

Decline reason:

It seems to me that some of your edits (in articles since deleted) were meant to attack potentially identifiable living people. This we cannot take so lightly as to just let you edit again after that admission. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:12, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theriwolf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The pages were not attacks on living people, they were nonsense pages created with random names. They were not based on any personally indentifiable individual.

Decline reason:

Still not unblocking. 狐 Déan rolla bairille! 13:30, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theriwolf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I greatly appologize. Please unblock my account. I will not make any further hoaxes on wikipedia. I was really bored, and admit to being extremely stupid.

Decline reason:

I note your apology, and your self-assessment. All of your edits, except your unblock requests, are vandalism edits, and wikipedia is not a playground designed to relieve your boredom. Nevertheless, if unblocked what would you intend to write about? --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 14:37, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of NavaShield

The article NavaShield has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable virus.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mythpage88 (talk) 04:00, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]