User talk:Theredchief
Blocked
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nick-D (talk) 11:51, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Theredchief (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Whilst I've recently become familiar with the writings of the banned editor to which you refer by following a specific talk page, and have some sympathy for them, I am not in fact this person. How is discussing the sources relied upon by Rodney Liddell to write The Savage Frontier pushing personal views? I was just about to make my point about them. My brother is also involved with wikipedia and uses the sole computer in this household, it would be unfair to exclude his contributions too. Theredchief (talk) 12:01, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon::==( o ) 14:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Are either of the named accounts above your brother? If you and your brother edit in the same areas of interest, it's likely that you would be considered one editor for the purposes of blocks and bans and such. Either way, no you will not be unblocked just so that your brother can edit. There are other ways to fix that, if consensus deems it necessary. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 12:11, 26 April 2011 (UTC)