User talk:Therandomarticle

Welcome!

Hello, Therandomarticle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Walney Wind Farm. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! . Gareth Griffith‑Jones ^{The Welsh Buzzard} 07:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Failure Is Not an Option (book) (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Failure Is Not an Option instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Why can't this be explained in a section on the main page? It's certainly related to the main quote.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Failure Is Not an Option (book) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Failure Is Not an Option (book), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:37, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of most powerful wind turbines has been accepted

List of most powerful wind turbines, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 22:21, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carbon Neutrality Coalition has been accepted

Carbon Neutrality Coalition, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 16:25, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Powering Past Coal Alliance has been accepted

Powering Past Coal Alliance, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 16:25, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Carbon Neutrality Coalition moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, ARTICLENAME, had an improper review and is not ready to remain published. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 23:32, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Powering Past Coal Alliance moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, ARTICLENAME, had an improper review and is not ready to remain published. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 23:33, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @DGG: I can't see the improper review mentioned, so I'm not sure what the concern is with this article being in mainspace? It was previously in mainspace for over a year. I see @Delusion23: has now re-listed it for creation but it says on the page this could take 4 months Therandomarticle (talk) 22:57, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also the same query with Carbon_Neutrality_Coalition

This was one of a large number of reviews done by sock or meat puppets of an undeclared paid editing ring who were reviewing each others work. At least some of the work was highly promotional .The editors in the ring have now been blocked. AT WP:COIN is was decided that it would be necessary to re-review almost all of their work. For these 2 articles, the material was presented using infoboxes for emphasis in a non standard and unacceptable way (which I fixed myself), and is in my opinion as much advocacy as encyclopedic. It's difficult to write well about advocacy organizations, especially when they're advocating fo things most people would support. Some additional third party sources would help. Changing cherry-picked display quotes into ordinary quoted text would also help, and probably the place for the lists of participants is their organizations own website. :It rarely takes 4 months. Fewer than 10% of the articles wait more than one or two months. The time is unpredictable, as most reviewers do not work in chronological order. In the meantime, improve the articles. DGG ( talk ) 23:12, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: OK thanks for the explanation and for the edits/fixes Therandomarticle (talk) 23:18, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carbon Neutrality Coalition has been accepted

Carbon Neutrality Coalition, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chidgk1 (talk) 10:50, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Carbon Neutrality Coalition

Hello, Therandomarticle,

Thank you for creating Carbon Neutrality Coalition.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi, the references need to be fiilled in particularly the publisher/work field

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Atlantic306 (talk) 18:33, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]