User talk:Thepalerider2012

Welcome!

Hello, Thepalerider2012, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Quantum mechanics. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! RockMagnetist (talk) 15:11, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quantum mechanics lead

Thepalerider2012, thank you for your contributions to Quantum mechanics. You added a lot of good material, but the lead isn't the right place for it. The lead of an article should be a concise summary of the article (see WP:LEAD), and it was about the right size before your edits. Also, some of the your additions duplicate material in the History section. I suggest you combine the two historical accounts. Here is a link containing your edits. Also, I think many people would question your inclusion of the early wave theory of light in the history of quantum mechanics. RockMagnetist (talk) 15:19, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

yeah i know but i didnt find the main article history of quantum mechanics to introduce my changes, although in my opinion i think it is in a good size, i think you should reconsider(Thepalerider2012 (talk) 18:45, 3 October 2012 (UTC))[reply]

I copied your comment here because it is easier to follow conversations on a single page (see the talk page guidelines) . I have your page on the watchlist for now, so you can reply here.

I'm not sure what you mean. There is a History of quantum mechanics, but Quantum mechanics also has a history section. That's where your edits should go, not the lead of Quantum mechanics. If you want to see how a lead should look, check out a few featured physics articles such as General relativity. RockMagnetist (talk) 18:54, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i see for the first time i didnt see the history section thx for the advice , may i introduce the previous changes by now (Thepalerider2012 (talk) 19:09, 3 October 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Much better! RockMagnetist (talk) 20:22, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

The text you added to the article on Schrödinger in September is an exact copy from this article: O'Conner, J. J. (October 2003). "Schrödinger Biography". University of St. Andrews. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help) There are strong laws against copying other people's writing. This doesn't mean you will get in trouble. This does mean that Wikipedia could get in trouble. If Wikipedia didn't keep checking and removing copies, it could get banned from the Internet.

The parts you added need to be rewritten or they will be removed. Write a summary using the reference. If you don't want to write in English, write in Portuguese and put it here. Then we can ask for help translating it at Wikipedia:Translators_available#Portuguese-to-English. StarryGrandma (talk) 19:55, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

may i translate content from others wikis?(Thepalerider2012 (talk) 21:43, 22 October 2012 (UTC))[reply]

The short answer is Yes. The longer answer is follow the guidelines in Wikipedia:Translation#How_to_translate. You need to put in a reference to the original article the information came from. Do this by putting a "translated from" template on the Talk page of the article. That tells people what article it came from, in what language, and what section of the English article it went into. I can show you how once you've put something in. Happy editing. StarryGrandma (talk) 02:13, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The science portal

I noticed your edit at Portal:Science/Featured biography/4, and have re-arranged it a bit. The portal displays a random selection from a list of possible articles which you can see at Portal:Science/Featured biography. You overwrote the fourth article with a new one. I have restored the fourth article and have added your new suggestion at the end of the list. I hope that makes sense.

You may find that other editors disagree with this choice, since Werner Heisenberg is not currently marked as either a "Featured" or "Good" article, but that is a different issue. -- John of Reading (talk) 06:29, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the help , im still learning how to use wikipedia tools , but i dont get it when u said heisenberg's article is not good , its seems pretty complete to me(Thepalerider2012 (talk) 22:27, 25 October 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Yes, it looks complete enough to me, too. But these are "official" assessment schemes at Wikipedia - "Wikipedia:Featured articles" and "Wikipedia:Good articles" - and no-one has got round to checking the Werner Heisenberg article against those quality standards since 2009 (Talk:Werner Heisenberg/GA1). (Notice that I am using colons to indent the replies here; another Wikipedia convention) -- John of Reading (talk) 06:34, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Quantum mechanics, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. RockMagnetist (talk) 23:41, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i dont understand i just added links to paul dirac's page (Thepalerider2012 (talk) 23:44, 5 November 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Have a look at Wikipedia's guideline on links. There should generally be just one link to any given page - preferably the first time the subject is mentioned. RockMagnetist (talk) 23:56, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:Nelson Mandela for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:45, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing. Either provide reliable sources or stop with the libellous comments NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:21, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Nelson Mandela, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. [1] For the last time, either provide sources that back up your assertions or refrain from making them. The talk page of an article is not the place to write about what you thought about the subject. Unfounded speculation about an editor's neutrality is also off limits. The next time you do either, a report to WP:ANI will be made. NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:40, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]