User talk:Theorphanelf

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to East Davidson High School, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 19:49, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at East Davidson High School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 19:50, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at East Davidson High School, you may be blocked from editing. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 20:31, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at East Davidson High School, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 20:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:26, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theorphanelf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the only thing in my edit that wasn't accurate was that the principal was Christopher Columbus, and that the school had 102,644 students, and that it was founded in 1492. Everything else, literally everything else is true. I just wanted it to be documented. Theorphanelf (talk) 22:31, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --Chris (talk) 22:42, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theorphanelf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Since you need "convincing" instead of factual information, I have never tried to edit another page. The editing I did on East Davidson High School's page was not at all "vandalism" because everything was true. If I had made outrageous claims against the school that would be another thing. That would be slander, which still isn't vandalism. For that reason, I am appealing to be unblocked. Theorphanelf (talk) 22:50, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It was simple, childish vandalism. Kuru (talk) 22:57, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theorphanelf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How exactly are facts childish vandalism? The truth might not always be pleasing to read, but it's the truth and shouldn't be kept from the public. Theorphanelf (talk) 23:03, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Oh yeah, talk page access revoked. Max Semenik (talk) 23:08, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user (block log | active blocks | autoblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs | abuse log) has had their talkpage access revoked because an administrator has identified this users talkpage edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. If you would like to make further requests, you may contact the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. Please note that there could be appeals to unblock-en-l that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.