User talk:Theoriginalturtle

Welcome!

Hello, Theoriginalturtle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- The Red Pen of Doom 13:09, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Russell Reed Benedict.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Snowysusan (talk) 00:33, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Russell Reed Benedict

Hi Turtle,

From what little I have been able to find, along with the information in your article, it appears likely that Russell Reed Benedict was a notable person. I did a bit of work editing your article and adding some suggested categories (you can change these to whatever you think works), but I couldn't find much on the internet to help you with sources. I added an external link to a site about him but it would not be considered a reliable, independent source by Wikipedia. There are two newspaper articles in the Santa Fe New Mexican from 1954 at http://newspaperarchive.com/santa-fe-new-mexican/1954-07-18/ and http://newspaperarchive.com/santa-fe-new-mexican/1954-04-15/page-5/that refer to him but that's a pay per view site - maybe you can locate news articles somewhere else.

As it stands, the only two references you cite in your article are a political magazine that makes no reference to him at all - only to Packard - and his wife's obituary. These won't be sufficient to get the article accepted because they don't support much of the information contained in your article. All the information about him should be supported by reference to an independent, reliable source. I encourage you to try to find good sources for the article and add them. If your article is rejected again in the meantime, please continue to work on it and resubmit it for review. If I can be of any further assistance, please contact me on my talk page. Best Regards, --Snowysusan (talk) 08:40, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have been working on this. I've been in touch with one granddaughter and one actual daughter... she has provided links to family photographs, and family stories dating back to the mid-1940s about Russ and his first wife's involvement with the World Federalist Movement, including participation in the 1947 conference in Asheville, North Carolina. Russ talked about this when I knew him in the 1980s... he was very proud to consider himself a "citizen of the world."

As it turns out, Russ' younger brother, Stephen Benedict, is still alive and was a major player in the Theatre Development Fund, the people who created the "TKTS" kiosk in Times Square! I couldn't be more proud. I'm trying to make arrangements to interview him, although Russ' daughter, Barbara, has advised that Stephen doesn't like to talk about his late brother.

FWIW, Campaigns & Elections never bothered to respond to several inquiries about access to their archives. Hhhhhh....

Theoriginalturtle (talk)

Unfortunately personal interviews or private research are not welcome on Wikipedia. Sources need to be published and publicly available. By all means interview the family if you want to, but don't publish your findings here. Sionk (talk) 19:43, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Russell Reed Benedict.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 19:38, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Russell Reed Benedict concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Russell Reed Benedict, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:12, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Russell Reed Benedict concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Russell Reed Benedict, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Russell Reed Benedict

Hello Theoriginalturtle. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Russell Reed Benedict".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Russell Reed Benedict}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:01, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aladdin's Castle

The article Aladdin's Castle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources. Only reference is to a primary source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 21:17, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pin Pan Alley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pin Pan Alley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pin Pan Alley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. › Mortee _talk 00:37, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]