User talk:ThenewEmilyLevesque

January 2018

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ThenewEmilyLevesque (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am NOT a sockpuppet of JoeyPknowsalotaboutthat. I know him in real life, but he said he doesn't want to make a block evasion or even come back because of how ArianeWiki1 treated him. I think he doesn't even know that I am editing here! I am telling the truth. Also, my edits show that I am here to build an encyclopedia! --ThenewEmilyLevesque (talk) 18:44, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed block evasion from JoeyP. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:16, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ThenewEmilyLevesque (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am using his computer without him knowing. I am one of his relatives, and I told you, he doesn't even want to make a block evasion because of the community. Also, I need to admit one thing: I am the same person as User talk:2407:7000:817C:1730:5906:3419:91D1:F3D, and that was NOT a block evasion.

Decline reason:

This is a violation of WP:MEAT if not a full-on sockpuppet account. But of course, it is indeed a full-on sockpuppet account, obviously. Yamla (talk) 21:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Calm down, don't be crazy ok! I am the child of his older sister who died in 2007! And sorry if my actions offended you! I am telling the truth! (also Joey was at the mall this morning when I made these edits!

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. RickinBaltimore (talk) 02:10, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And you have wasted enough of our time with this. Talk page access revoked. RickinBaltimore (talk) 02:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]