Disallowed external link

You asked about my comment here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Thingg#noob_alert. It appears that the issue has been addressed in several comments on the talk page of the IP you were using for the edits you said you had made, namely http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:195.173.69.2. 1)How are you affiliated with these *-directory sites and 2)are these yours http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/86.0.193.129 too)? 3)Are the sites themselves non-commercial? --IReceivedDeathThreats (talk) 05:29, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Thanks you for getting back in touch. Please accept my apologies for the confusion over the various IP's I have been using. At first, I didn't realise I was on a public IP. I also made a submission from another PC so that would confuse things further. Finally, I created an account (this one) and have been using it since. I hope this explains things.

Here are the answers to your questions:

1) I created the site myself. There is only 1 site involved - semi-directory.com. I am involved with no others. 2) Of the posts listed on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/86.0.193.129, only the ones dated 1st may 2008 are mine. The others are not. I have no idea who wrote the others. 3) The anser to this is both 'yes' and 'no'. The site is free to use and free to register with. Every semiconductor establishment (commercial and non-profit) is entitled to a free listing in the directory. However, commercial organizations can upgrade to a 'premium' account to unlock certain tools such as the ability to post corporate events and press releases. Banner advertising is also available.

The site was created with the intention of helping people in the semiconductor industry research potential suppliers and offer a resource to download technical papers, literature and interview for free (www.semi-directory.com/downloads.asp). The primary intention of the site is not to make money.

Since a few people are involved in this issue now, who is the admin I should be talking to about this?

Themintyman (talk) 12:15, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines mentions using colons for threaded discussions, like I've used here. I see you've figured out how to sign your post; good going. If you feel your edits respect Wikipedia:Spam#External_link_spamming, then that page should have pointers about how to proceed. I'm thinking it doesn't. That doesn't mean it's not a legit site. It just means I think it doesn't belong where you've put it here on Wikipedia. --IReceivedDeathThreats (talk) 19:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re. your comment on my talk page: Take a closer look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links#Advertising_and_conflicts_of_interest. I just don't have more time to devote to this issue.--IReceivedDeathThreats (talk) 00:15, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Electronics collaboration

Hi, I am writing to you because you have listed yourself as a member of the Electronics WikiProject. Sadly, this project is pretty dead, but I propose to resuscitate it with a collaboration. The idea is to have a concerted effort on improving one article per month, hopefully to GA or FA status and nominate the very best of them for the front page. I have prepared a page to control this process at Wikipedia:WikiProject Electronics/Collaboration (actually, I mostly shamelessly stole it from Wikipedia:WikiProject Mammals where a collaboration of this sort was succesfully run). There you can make nominations for articles for collaboration or comment on the nominations of others.

If you want to take part you might like to place this template {{WikiProject Electronics Collaboration}} on your userpage which will give you a link to the current collaboration. If you are no longer interested in Wikiproject Electronics, please remove yourself from the members list, which is now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Electronics/Members

Thanks for listening, SpinningSpark 17:50, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]