User talk:Themightyquill/Archive10

cfi!

further to previous

[1] [2]. keyboard wifi key missing, will inbox you.Skookum1 (talk) 07:11, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

please note revised Chiatowns section vs how it was, and inline comments re sources and issues/cotext). more canadians needed, and help revising poor writing, arranging content cogently, checking for American spellings/usages, as well as addressing POV and synth et al.Skookum1 (talk) 07:16, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it's time to take a break from wikipedia and cool off for a bit? - TheMightyQuill (talk) 09:28, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it's time for Wikipedians to step up to bat about NPOV instead of telling me to take a break....more and more I have been, and only revising that one article to make it readable and less repetitious and clunky, and adding balanced information (from readily-available online sources that have always been there). If other Canadian editors weren't so stand-offish about POV topics and/or because of me being the only one that cares about NPOV issues and integrity and fairness of historical coverage, I wouldn't have to be doing all the work; and I wouldn't be dragged to ANI on behavioural guidelines being invoked - as a means to sidestep confronting outright POV activity....and just plain old bad writing.

I've been improving the article in genuine-wikipedian terms, and am now being railed against for "bad behaviour" i.e. for disputing POV content and activities to further/protect that POV, all of which are contrary to policy but nobody seems to give a damn about anymore. I'm trying to recruit new blood to Wikipedia from BC community and museum and professional historian/authors .... as WP:CANADA doesn't seem to have anybody around who gives a shit about BC content, or knows enough to recognize problems when they emerge. THIS problem had big red flashing lights on it from the start and I shouldn't have had to be the only Canadian trying to deal with it..... and I shouldn't be being shit on or told "go take a holiday" for standing up for the POV policy, which nobody else is.Skookum1 (talk) 09:51, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Maybe it's time to take a break from wikipedia and cool off for a bit?" - why does nobody ever say that to WhisperToMe? Why is it so important for him, as a Texan, to have the subject of Chinese history in British Columbia exclusively his own; why is it such a big issue for him and why does he spend so much time attacking the one wikipedian who knows a whole lot about the subject matter and further sources? Why, indeed.Skookum1 (talk) 09:54, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Elise Otté

On 17 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elise Otté, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that scholar and linguist Elise Otté assisted her stepfather in translating the Elder Edda, but found working with him intolerable? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elise Otté. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photo request bots

Hi -- just letting you know that I'm catching up to old business and replied to the suggestion you left at User talk:PhotoCatBot. Happy to carry on a discussion about it (preferably there). —Tim Pierce (talk) 16:43, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marcy Page

Thanks very much for creating Marcy Page. I expressed myself badly in the edit summary, so let me just explain that I felt "...who specialized in..." -- past tense -- seems to me to imply that she will no longer be working in animation film at all, whereas in that excellent Dan Sarto interview you link to, she does say she already has plans to pursue a variety of animation-related projects with Regina Pessoa, among others. thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:59, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Newspapers.com check-in

Hello Themightyquill,

You are receiving this message because you have a one-year subscription to Newspapers.com through the Wikipedia Library. This is a brief update, to remind you about that access:

Please make sure that you can still log in to your Newspapers.com account. If you are having trouble let me know.
Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, to include citations with links on Wikipedia. Links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. Also, keep in mind that part of Newspapers.com is open access via the clipping function. Clippings allow you to identify particular articles, extract them from the original full sheet newspaper, and share them through unique URLs. Wikipedia users who click on a clipping link in your citation list will be able to access that particular article, and the full page of the paper if they come from the clipping, without needing to subscribe to Newspapers.com. For more information about how to use clippings, see http://www.newspapers.com/basics/#h-clips .
Do you write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let me know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate it if you filled out this short survey. Your input will help us to facilitate this particular partnership, and to discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you,

Wikipedia Library Newspapers.com account coordinator HazelAB (talk) 00:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Rhodes Must Fall

On 28 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rhodes Must Fall, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a protest movement began after excrement was thrown at a university statue in South Africa? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rhodes Must Fall. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:03, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 19 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Estépar page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia email re Newspapers.com signup

Your free one-year account with Newspapers.com will end on August 11 2015. Newspapers.com has offered to extend existing accounts by another year. If you wish to keep your account until August 11 2016, please add your name to the Account Renewal list here. I'll let Newspapers.com customer support know, and they will extend your subscription. If you don't want to keep your account for another year, you don't have to do anything. Your account will expire unless I hear from you that you want to keep it. All the best, HazelAB (talk) 12:12, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

removed Category:Canada in World War I

Greetings quill, just a bit curious about why you're removing this from articles? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 19:08, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Keith-264:, thanks for your message. I think I only removed it from articles that were already in Category:Battles of World War I involving Canada, which is a subcategory of Category:Canada in World War I. If there is some reason those few articles should be in both the parent and child category, you are welcome to re-add them. I figured it was an accident, but I should have left a clearer edit summary. - Themightyquill (talk) 20:44, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, I tend to assume that when people do technical things, it's because they know what they're doing and I can learn something from them. It looks like I hit the jackpot again; thanks very much! Regards Keith-264 (talk) 21:37, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It certainly never hurts to ask. It's easy to make mistakes when adding and removing categories. - Themightyquill (talk) 07:19, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Spuzzum First Nation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spuzzum First Nation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spuzzum First Nation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 23:00, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cataloging and library science

I see that you removed the category "library science" from Cataloging. Can you explain your thinking? Is there a definition of the category that would exclude cataloging? Thanks, LaMona (talk) 00:21, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@LaMona: Absolutely - thanks for asking. Cataloging is already in Category:Library cataloging and classification, which is a sub-category of Category:Library science. Generally, we don't keep articles in both parent and child categories within the same category tree (see WP:SUBCAT) but perhaps I've missed something and made an error? Let me know. - Themightyquill (talk) 10:14, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Themightyquill: Thanks for the explanation. I don't pay much attention to categories, so that helps. Write on! LaMona (talk) 16:39, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Oka Crisis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Among those charged and convicted for their participation was Ronald Casalpro (who used the alias Ronald "Lasagna" Cross during the conflict. Casalpro was beaten by Sûreté du
t mean the political establishment or media establishment, it means ''ALL'' Anglophone Canadians (or rather it means all non-Quebec francophones; not sure how to reword it and shouldn't be deleted

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:37, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI

pls see Talk:Military history of Canada#Oka image again.Jjust wondering what you think...have always though it was odd that this image gets removed all the time yet the Wait for Me, Daddy image and File:Soldier-and-child-octcri.jpg never get removed yet are in the same circumstance (as in copyrighted). Do some find the image offensive? Or is it just fly by editors that dont see the others - as dont care to read the article before removing images? -- Moxy (talk) 21:27, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moxy - it could be the content, but it might just be the fact that the Oka image is colour, whereas the others are black and white. They might assume anything black & white is pd? I have no idea. - Themightyquill (talk) 07:11, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]