User talk:Themasterofwiki

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! --Simonkoldyk 18:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Thanks

Nothing in particular, just noticed you hadn't been welcomed to Wikipedia yet. Also I saw on your talk page about looking to become an administrator, you may want to check this out. --Simonkoldyk 21:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Teletubbies

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Re:Protection

Unfortunately, adding the {{sprotected}} tag to a page like Teletubbies does absolutely nothing. For a page to be protected, you have to ask an administrator such as myself to manually protect the page. Thanks. Nishkid 64 21:40, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Becoming an administrator

I'm not one myself, but you have to have a substantial number of edits and would have to be elected one by the majority of other users who will support you. I hope this helps. Marcus2 21:46, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SpongeBob and Rugrats

Hi! Rugrats is NOT Nickelodeon's most popular original series of all time. SpongeBob SquarePants is, because this was a craze that really shook popular culture and the media. And from my perception, Rugrats was NEVER as big as or bigger than SpongeBob SquarePants was at the height of its popularity. Also, the main character, SpongeBob SquarePants, has become an international icon. The Rugrats never became international icons like SpongeBob has. The truth is within your grasp. And the Powerpuff Girls were never very popular, but you would never believe that. You'd rather believe the myth that the show was a runaway smash hit. The Powerpuff Girls Movie only achieved 11 million dollars, as opposed to a movie like Disney's The Little Mermaid, which achieved over $100,000,000 thirteen years before. This is one version of the truth. If you don't start making constructive or truthful edits, or those that are facts, you'll never become a Wikipedia administrator. Marcus2 15:14, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You recently took back what you told me the other day. Marcus2 15:48, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Attack

Please do not make personal attacks on other people as you did at User:Burger here. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. NauticaShad e s 13:20, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Barney & Friends, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --- RockMFR 16:25, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fat Abbot

Fat Abbot has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt the subject might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability for the relevant concerns. An example of notability guidelines can be found at Wikipedia:Notability (websites). If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 14:20, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't change information if you are unsure about it, as with the rating of Ren & Stimpy Adult Party Cartoon. Also, please be sure to check your spelling when editing, or your edits may be reverted for appearing to be vandalism. —tregoweth (talk) 16:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Yakety Yak is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —tregoweth (talk) 21:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He means you need to stop adding nonsense to random areas of pages. It's disruptive. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 05:58, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No I read that in the Nicktoons article.Themasterofwiki 13:10, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Further Inappropriate comments

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, as you did at User talk:Someguy0830, you will be blocked for disruption. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tellyaddict (talk • contribs).

Hi

I notice on your user page it says that you want to become an administrator.

First and foremost, working on getting an article featured or submitting other featured content will help immensely.
Secondly, if you want to be handed the mop and bucket, you should first enable "My Preferences"→"Editing"→"Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" — Veteran wikipedians will oppose a WP:RFA because of inconsistent use of edit summaries. Taking the extra moment to supply these, even if they a short extract of your addition, is appreciated by other user when we have to track down vandalism: edits with summaries are better respected and are more likely to be kept. Although I'm not familiar with the above incidents on this page, this may have helped clear up similar matters before they escalated.
Third, remember to keep cool when the editing gets hot. Sometimes the only way an article will progress is when entire sections are merged or even removed. (example)

I welcome your continued submissions to Wikipedia! --DavidH Oz Au 02:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Help Create Wikiproject Sonic The Hedgehog

Themasterofwiki 13:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)Hello I saw your comment on my talk page and I was wondering if you would like to help me create a Wiki Project Sonic The Hedgehog.[reply]

Sorry for the long delay, but I've been busy with offline concerns. For the record, we used to have a Wikipedia:WikiProject Sega, but nobody used it. It was eventually made into a task force of WikiProject Computer and Video Games, accessible via WP:SEGA. I don't think a WikiProject that is even more specific than WikiProject Sega will have much success. —davidh.oz.au 08:17, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I hope we can still eventully get Wikiproject Sonic started we need to fix some problems with the page and I think more pepole will notice it if it's Sonic than Sega.Themasterofwiki 17:45, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{Sonic games}} inclusion criteria

Sorry, I meant to add this note to your talk page much earlier, but was busy at the time: :sweatdrop:

An inclusion criteria for {{Sonic games}} and related templates has been proposed at Template talk:Sonic games#Totally new inclusion criteria, with an introductory preamble at #Shadow III: Son of Shadow, #Proposed inclusion criteria, and #Inclusion of Sonic Rush. You are cordially invited to discuss the proposal.

—davidh.oz.au 23:41, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response

I have responded on my talk page. -Sukecchi 12:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SpongeBob SquarePants (disambiguation)

The article SpongeBob SquarePants (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All of the things listed here are related to SpongeBob SquarePants (i.e. the article that links to this page), and all or most of these pages are linked to from that article. Disambiguation pages are intended to list multiple things that are unrelated, not to list things that are entirely related.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oxguy3^{[dubious – discuss]} 20:26, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]