User talk:Themanhascome

April 2019

Your recent editing history at Taras Bulba-Borovets shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
The next person to revert will be blocked. Use the talkpage. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 23:44, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification. I will make no reverts, and use the talk page. Themanhascome (talk) 00:26, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- Amanda (aka DQ) 06:21, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Themanhascome (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am appealing my block because Nicoljaus refused to go to the talk page of the Taras Bulba-Borovets page and instead chose to complain to an administrator because he did not want to reach a consensus right before he was blocked himself. He repeatedly deleted sourced information that was verifiable. As someone who is new to Wikipedia, I am not very familiar with the 3-revert rule, but I am willing to stay away from the Borovets page entirely now that I realize that Nicoljaus will start meaningless edit wars and even go so far as to delete sourced and verifiable sentences. I apologize for my temperament, but I was outraged when Nicoljaus erroneously referred to me as someone who supports Nazi ideology and made an unsubstantiated and further personal attack against myself and Lute88 by claiming that I am his sock puppet. He has made numerous attacks against other users in the past, including but not limited to Lute88, by fallaciously calling them "Nazis". Despite this, I am willing to stay away from the Borovets page and him as well if I am unblocked. Thank you very much. Themanhascome (talk) 20:53, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:48, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

New Block Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Themanhascome (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am submitting a second block appeal because I have learned that my behavior was disruptive at the Taras Bulba-Borovets page and that I will not only avoid the Borovets page altogether in the future, but that I will also refrain from edit warring now that I am familiar with what constitutes edit warring. Contrary to Nicoljaus' further attacks against me, I am not a sockpuppet and have no intention of making further disruptive edits or engaging in edit warring. Themanhascome (talk) 19:20, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 12:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Problem is though I found a sock UkrainianSavior (talk · contribs) since your last appeal. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 19:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can assure you, I know nothing about this UkrainianSavior user and I am not affiliated with this account in any way. Themanhascome (talk) 23:38, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to note that Nicolajaus is now putting his suspected locations of previously blocked users he incorrectly assumes are sockpuppets I have used on his talk page. Whether or not these are the actual locations of previously blocked users I do not know, but he seems to want to stir up trouble and perhaps even start conflict in these places here in the US that he has listed. Themanhascome (talk) 02:48, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I should also note that I do not live in any of the areas he mentioned, which further negates his claim that I am a sockpuppet. Themanhascome (talk) 04:18, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Has any progress been made in regards to the decision on my unblock request? I am eager to return to Wikipedia so that I can make positive contributions and avoid edit warring. I have learned my lesson. Thank you very much. Themanhascome (talk) 14:51, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Has there been any progress in regards to my unblock request? Thanks. Themanhascome (talk) 04:23, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]