User talk:Theman81

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Die Hard, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 05:13, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Rapping. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 05:26, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to 24 (TV series). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 05:28, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lady Gaga, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lady Gaga was changed by Theman81 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888695 on 2011-05-27T08:15:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:16, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Lady Gaga. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 16:29, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lady Gaga, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lady Gaga was changed by Theman81 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881007 on 2011-06-18T23:55:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:56, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Legolas2186 with this edit. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you, —Tom Morris (talk) 23:59, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:Legolas2186. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Funandtrvl (talk) 00:02, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to articles as you apparently did to Lady Gaga. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:33, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you understand plain and simple English, not to add original research or unreliable sources to Lady Gaga? Or you don't read the warnings given here? Are you itching to get yourself blocked because you are well on your way dude. This is the only warning you will get. If you don't stop adding unreliable sources to WP articles, yes, you will be blocked. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 13:20, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Gaga

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- MelbourneStar☆ ^{(talk to me)} 13:29, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 13:30, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for various kinds of unconstructive editing, including continually inserting information without reliable sources despite warnings, removing references to reliable sources and inserting references to unreliable sources, edit warring, and personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:41, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Lady Gaga, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:05, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reported at WP:AIV for repeated vandalisms. If you donot change your ways you will be blocked indefinitely from editing. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:14, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You really don't understand do you? However many times you add unreliable info, you will be reverted. So stop being an idiot and quit now. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:16, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can't do anything by vandalizing, by any means continue. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:34, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:49, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please take this time to reflect on our policies like reliable sources and no personal attack. What you have done does not warranty any chance, but the blocking admin has kindly given you. So please read these policies, ask me if you have any questions and stop vandalizing. If you don't the next step will be to stop you editing here indefinitely. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 10:08, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User:Legolas2186, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 15:38, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. m.o.p 16:01, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Theman81 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:07, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Theman81 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:59, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Theman81 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:18, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Theman81 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 07:32, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Theman81 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 14:24, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]