User talk:Theleekycauldron/Archive/2021/March

DYK for SLAPP Suits

On 1 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SLAPP Suits, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John Oliver was sued for defamation when he made a man in a large squirrel costume tell a coal industry CEO to "eat shit" on his show? You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, SLAPP Suits), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Oliver SLAPP Suits.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:John Oliver SLAPP Suits.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 19:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of That Vegan Teacher for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article That Vegan Teacher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That Vegan Teacher until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Linguist111^talk 10:25, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Amicusbriefaclu.png

Thanks for uploading File:Amicusbriefaclu.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:45, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Amicusbriefaclu.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Amicusbriefaclu.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 00:29, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amicusbriefaclu.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Amicusbriefaclu.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of SLAPP Suits

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SLAPP Suits you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of SLAPP Suits

The article SLAPP Suits you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:SLAPP Suits for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of SLAPP Suits

The article SLAPP Suits you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SLAPP Suits for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:02, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Code Bullet

Hello, Theleekycauldron. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Code Bullet".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

Your DYK hook about SLAPP Suits and a man in a squirrel suit telling a coal industry CEO to "eat shit" drew 11,724 page views (977 per hour) while on the Main Page. It is one of the most viewed hooks for the month of March as shown at Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics#March 2021. Keep up the great work! Cbl62 (talk) 18:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Peter Oberacker

Hello, Theleekycauldron,

Thank you for creating Peter Oberacker.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Can you fix reference 3?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 20:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC) @Joseywales1961: Done[reply]

Withdrawal request

I request that American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 gets withdrawn as a GA-nominee. I will let someone else nominate it instead. ARP2021 (talk) 20:51, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of rollback

[1] very sorry about that! Fatty thumbs I'm afraid. ——Serial 05:34, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Serial Number 54129: no problem at all! :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 00:27, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Andrew Cuomo sexual harassment allegations

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Andrew Cuomo sexual harassment allegations you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 06:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Andrew Cuomo sexual harassment allegations

The article Andrew Cuomo sexual harassment allegations you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Andrew Cuomo sexual harassment allegations for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 07:01, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of A West Wing Special to Benefit When We All Vote

Hello! Your submission of A West Wing Special to Benefit When We All Vote at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! HouseOfChange (talk) 13:05, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]