User talk:Theladyisgaga

Theladyisgaga, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Theladyisgaga! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Worm That Turned (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About Melanie Martinez pages..

So seeing you are a big Melanie fan, as am i, I want to edit/make pages too. Being mainly a Charli XCX fan, I edit her pages a lot. She has 2 singles that don't have pages so i decided to make them. They kept repeatedly getting deleted. I found out there is this thing called WP:NSONGS in which some pages can be chosen for deletion if they don't follow these guidelines for singles and songs. I don't want to delete any of your pages for Melanies singles, but some wiki editors may do so, considering none of your pages of her songs contain any significant chart performance, has won an award, or has been including in notable media. Pretty much all of her song pages may be deleted except Carousel, considering its her only song that has charted or has been included in media (american horror story for example). i am going to try my best to make sure they dont get deleted, cause it sucks when it does cause you work so hard on it :( yeah, sorry for my long paragraph but i felt you needed to know this information Heres a link to all of Melanies charted songs in the US that can have pages i believe: Click this

UPDATE: I fixed and cleaned up Carousel so it should be perfectly fine Xenonkiwi111 (talk) 01:56, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Soap and Sippycup

I wouldn't have gotten rid of the page if you added citations and sourced it. there were no sources. And promo singles can still have music videos.

UPDATE: You're welcome for Carousel!! I'm working on Pity Party now :) To add citations/sources, click the button that says Cite your sources: <ref.> </ref> right under the editing part of the page but above the edit summary. Insert the url of the page(source) you have inbetween the refs. For pictures, Here is a link but to upload, your account needs to be verified which basically means that you have to make more than 10 edits on your account and your account needs to be at least 5 days old. (if i am correct). It'll give you a message if you can't. When uploading pictures, i make album/single covers 300x300 and png file. Heres a picture editor And you need to license the photo or it will be deleted in 7 days. the only thing you have to do to license it is to list it as 'fair use' but you can just copy and paste everything from this page File:Melanie martinez carousel single cover.png, but make sure you change some things to the new article you are putting the photo into. Hope i helped :) Xenonkiwi111 (talk) 20:06, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pity Party

I fixed up pity party, I just want to let you know i didnt remove your quotes, i just moved them :)Xenonkiwi111 (talk) 21:04, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Melanie Martinez songs

Template:Melanie Martinez songs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Azealia911 _talk 19:31, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caitlyn Jenner recieving an ESPY Award.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Caitlyn Jenner recieving an ESPY Award.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Gaijin42 (talk) 22:27, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Your addition to Caitlyn Jenner has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Chase (talk | contributions) 00:54, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Caitlyn Jenner recieving an ESPY Award.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Caitlyn Jenner recieving an ESPY Award.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Blue, Marina and the Diamonds.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Blue, Marina and the Diamonds.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:This is the cover art for the single Forget off the album Froot by the artist Marina and the Diamonds. The cover art copyright is believed to belong to the label, Atlantic Records, or the graphic artist(s), Sam Coldy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:This is the cover art for the single Forget off the album Froot by the artist Marina and the Diamonds. The cover art copyright is believed to belong to the label, Atlantic Records, or the graphic artist(s), Sam Coldy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:50, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Ray of Light. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:43, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Ray of Light. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 18:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Ray of Light shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 23:20, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Carbrera (talk) 21:34, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How Big Tour

I reverted your changes to this page back to the redirect. The content you added is incomplete and completely unreferenced. Please review Wikipedia's citation and identification of reliable sources guidelines before changing the article again. This tour, unless notable, usually won't require its own page (especially if it's only a current event or if the tour was not notable enough to have its own article). Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:58, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dollhouse (Melanie Martinez EP) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dollhouse (Melanie Martinez EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dollhouse (Melanie Martinez EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kellymoat (talk) 11:28, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]