User talk:Thegreatsloth

This user is a student editor in University_of_California,_Berkeley/African_Politics_(Spring_2020) .

Welcome!

Hello, Thegreatsloth, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:45, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret Garry's Peer Review

Everything in the article seemed relevant to the topic, and nothing seemed out of place or unrelated. The article appeared to be written in a neutral way overall, there was just a small amount of bias towards the end of the background section with the phrase "seeing the necessity" and the word "noteworthy", but this did not seem to be a major issue within the article as a whole. I did not detect an overrepresentation or underrepresentation of viewpoints in the article. I tried out all of the links and they are working. The existing sources in the article support the preceding claims. There are a significant amount of unsupported claims throughout the article that need citations. Generally speaking, however, the author did a great job ensuring that references were reliable and trustworthy. The sources appear to be factually accurate, credible, neutral and do not appear to hold a significant bias. I look forward to reading more of the article as the author continues to edit, it is a great start! There is no additional thing that is significantly lacking from the article other than sources and content, (which will be lengthened with time).

MargaretGarry (talk) 20:39, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Margaret Garry[reply]