User talk:Thegreat100

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Thegreat100, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ysangkok (talk) 23:12, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Wizards of Waverly Place (season 4). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 06:02, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Wizards of Waverly Place (season 4). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AussieLegend (talk) 02:51, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Wizards of Waverly Place (season 4). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AussieLegend (talk) 12:47, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The content that you added with these edits is not supported by the citations in the article and the episode in question has yet to air. In cases such as this, if you add content you need to include attribution to a reliable source that supports the content being added, which you did not do. Additionally, there is a hidden comment in the article that clearly explains that statements that regular cast members are present for all episodes are unnecessary, because regular cast members are always assumed to be present for all episodes unless they are specifically mentioned as being absent from an episode. It further explains that "so far" is redundant because "all" mentions of actors presence or absence are "so far". Accordingly, please do not add such explanations, as you did here. --AussieLegend (talk) 12:56, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Wizards of Waverly Place (season 4). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AussieLegend (talk) 02:05, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Wizards of Waverly Place (season 4), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AussieLegend (talk) 06:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mateo Arias

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mateo Arias, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. SummerPhD (talk) 16:20, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain how you feel this article overcomes the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mateo arias, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mateo Arias and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mateo Arias (2nd nomination). - SummerPhD (talk) 17:11, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dylan Riley Snyder

The article Dylan Riley Snyder has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SummerPhD (talk) 17:12, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Monsters, Inc.. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. MikeWazowski (talk) 01:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dylan Riley Snyder for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dylan Riley Snyder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan Riley Snyder until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SummerPhD (talk) 22:43, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Derek Fisher, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You added unsourced and incorrect information after similar warnings in the past on other pages. —Bagumba (talk) 04:10, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Wizards of Waverly Place (season 4). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. There is a limit to the number of warnings that you will receive and we've been extremely generous to date AussieLegend (talk) 08:59, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Wizards of Waverly Place (season 4). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AussieLegend (talk) 05:19, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to The Muppets (film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. trainfan01 (talk) 16:26, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting and capitalisation

When making edits such as this, please ensure that the correct formatting and capitalisation are used and don't add huge strings of spaces at the end of lines as you did in that edit. Please note the fixes that were necessary as a result. You've received a number of warnings regarding the addition of unsourced content, such as that which was removed in this edit. Please do not continue to add unsourced future episode content. You need to include a citation from a reliable source that supports the content that you have added. --AussieLegend (talk) 08:01, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please start making an attempt to use correct capitalisation, as you didn't do in this edit to Wizards of Waverly Place (season 4), despite the request above. It really is becoming tiresome having to correct each of your edits. Please also note that, as per MOS:TV, fiction is always treated in the present; we use "is", not "was". Please note the corrections needed this time. --AussieLegend (talk) 11:07, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And yet again..... This edit was partially reverted for the resons explained in this edit summary and resulted in this net change to the article. Please attempt to make an effort. Failure to make any attempt to reduce the number of errors that you make is being inconsiderate to other editors. --AussieLegend (talk) 11:50, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Steve Terada

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Steve Terada, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. SummerPhD (talk) 06:18, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting and capitalisation....again

Really, how many times do you have to be warned about adding the same incorrect capitalisation that some other editor has to take time to fix?[1] --AussieLegend (talk) 02:48, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Careful with the POV

After I saw this edit to Oklahoma City Thunder, I nearly blocked your account for disruptive editing based on the history of warnings you received. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt, because you seem to have edited constructively since those warnings, but please be careful that you don't add a non-neutral point of view to articles. —C.Fred (talk) 01:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited The Avenging Quartet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark King (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]