User talk:Thegn

Hi Thegn, welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are a few helpful links to start you off: Avoiding common mistakes, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style, Policies and guidelines, Help, Merging pages.

If you need help or are curious about something, feel free to ask on my talk page or the village pump. You can sign your name and a date stamp on comments using four tildes (~~~~). If you have any further questions, feel free to ask, and I hope you enjoy being a Wikipedian! Andre (talk) 13:51, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Drink driving (United Kingdom), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. These edits appear to be original research to me. —Jonathan | Quality, not quantity. 14:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong illustration

The image

Middle Babylonian legal tablet from Alalah in its envelope

that you added to History of writing ancient numbers does not illustrate ancient numbers. Please use a different image that illustrates either cuneiform numbers or archaic (pre-cuneiform) numbers. Greensburger (talk) 22:28, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SheilaWhite.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SheilaWhite.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thames Ditton

Thank you for experimenting with the page Thames Ditton on Wikipedia. Your test worked, reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- SuzanneKn (talk) 17:16, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message on my user page. I did not want to upset you in any way. I am not sure that YouTube is classified as a suitable source. Check WP:Sources. SuzanneKn (talk) 16:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drunk driving (United Kingdom)

This article appears to be a copyvio you may wish to comment.Geni 22:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Palmisano2ndLife.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Palmisano2ndLife.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of OpenSocket

OpenSocket has been speedily deleted three times today as non-notable web content. If you are intent on creating an article, please establish WP:Notability. Creating the article again without establishing or asserting WP:Notability will be considered disruptive. Thanks. Toddst1 (talk) 17:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Defense vs. Defense

Please don't do this. See WP:ENGVAR. Quale (talk) 02:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:TDLTClogo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:TDLTClogo.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 03:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Lawson

Re. your adding "Dave Lawson - keyboards" to Tubular Bells, do you have any more information about this? I've never heard of him, and quite a lot has been written about the album. His website doesn't say what he did on the album (as far as I could see), could he have just been an engineer or consultant? --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have to say I was slightly surprised by Lawson's claim, as I have three CD versions of the album and have never seen the credit before. But Dave Lawson was a key member of the 70s band, Greenslade, who were a second-tier prog-rock band of a similar style to Camel. I'd like to see Lawson's claim either proved or refuted before the claim is removed from this entry. Can we leave it there for a week, rather than simply remove it because neither of us had heard of Lawson's involvement before? Thegn (talk) 21:39, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would question why the WP article specifies "keyboards" when Lawson's article doesn't name an instrument, nor specifically says he played on the album. As for leaving it up for a week, is this because you are making enquiries during this time, via Lawson's site or Oldfield's? (Oldfield has several official and fan sites with message boards.) --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 03:53, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent Mr. Lawson an email, and will let you know if I get a reply. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 16:41, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I got a reply! But there is a big problem. Here is what his email says:

"Thanks for getting in touch. I did not play on Tubular Bells and my only involvement with the album was through my friendship with Mike. I had recently bought a Synclavier, at that time it was 'cutting edge' technology and unsurpassed sonically. I gave Mike some of these sounds which were incorrectly titled as Fairbell samples, the programmer concerned probably re-sampled these sounds into Mike's Fairlight sampler. These ended up on the album and as they were clearly my original sounds I had felt I had contributed to the final tracks. Adrian Thomas who worked for Mike for some considerable time can verify these events."

The problem is that the equipment he mentions, did not exist in 1972/3. A very early version of the Synclavier existed sometime between 1975 and 1979; the article at WP just says 1975 but if you go to the external "history" link at the bottom, it says a computer that it was based on, was developed in 1975, and the first "Synclavier I" was created sometime later. It also says that it wasn't until the "Synclavier II", available in 1979, that it received wide public attention, and that happened in the 1980s, and even that version had mono sound; a stereo sampling version did not appear until 1984. Also, the Fairlight sampler was first marketed in 1979. I'm going to presume "Fairbell samples" means Fairlight's own samples of bell sounds, in which case I wonder if the album is actually Tubular Bells II which, as I recall, uses sampled bells instead of the real thing. I prefer not to write back to him and tell him he must be thinking of a completely different album. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 19:57, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aw, what the heck, I wrote back and told him about it. (I'll probably never get him to autograph a cover for me now!) :) --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 20:21, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Got another reply saying he thinks I'm right, and will change the album on his website. Actually, I'm not so sure I was right in saying it's TB2. If the work was done when Synclaviers and Fairlights were new, it could be an earlier album. "Long thin metallic hanging tubes" were used on "The Wind Chimes", "Amarok", and probably other songs. BTW, we can't decide whether or not to include him based on the quality of his voice. If we did that, I wouldn't be here. :) --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 20:45, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, i put your pic OakleyCourt.jpg into the WP-Commons. I hope i did it right. Because i need the pic for the german article. Thank you 80.134.189.80 (talk) 15:18, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:WestCroft.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:WestCroft.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:42, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Thegn! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 6 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 178 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Barry Trapnell - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Nigel Le Vaillant - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Peter Ellaway - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Paul Randolph - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Stephen Glaister - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
John Coll - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:47, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Surface Area and Volume Unit Scheme of Work for 9OMa2, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 23:32, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a place to do lesson plans -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 23:32, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mini-Nockers.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mini-Nockers.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 21:33, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nockers.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nockers.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 21:34, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Strategictactics.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Strategictactics.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 21:49, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Kubbuteo.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kubbuteo.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Kelly ^hi! 23:00, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:TDwordMap.jpg

How is this PD-self? I'd appreciate some more information on the file description page? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:32, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tim Fetherston-Dilke

The article Tim Fetherston-Dilke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence provided of any notability, and on searching none is likely to become evident

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusoe8181 (talk) 11:50, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Frederick William Sanderson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frederick William Sanderson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick William Sanderson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jimbo Wales (talk) 12:23, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Frederick William Sanderson

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Frederick William Sanderson, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2002/jul/06/schools.news, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Frederick William Sanderson and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Frederick William Sanderson, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Frederick William Sanderson with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Frederick William Sanderson. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Frederick William Sanderson saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! -- Trevj (talk) 15:58, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the template - just following the guidelines. I can see you don't need a "Welcome to Wikipedia". -- Trevj (talk) 15:59, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you wish to resume editing, it may be necessary for you to demonstrate your understanding of these policies and reassure the community of your willingness to comply. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Following the discovery of issues of copying above, I was asked to look more deeply into your contribution history. I see that you have been pasting content onto Wikipedia from various sources for many years. You have been notified of copyright policies multiple times and have obviously seen these notices, as you have removed them. (Removing three copyright cautions; removing two copyright cautions). In spite of this, you have persisted. The last article you created, Wayneflete Tower, copies content from the Wayneflete Tower, Esher, Surrey: Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results prepared by Wessex Archaeology, Ltd., published under full copyright reservation in 2006.

I'm afraid that under the circumstances it is necessary to conduct a review of your previous contributions to see what material may need to be removed for copyright concerns. You will not receive individual notice of issues found, as you had in the past, but can look at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Thegn to see what issues have been discovered and what actions have been taken.

While we certainly welcome your work to improve Wikipedia by adding new articles or editing existing ones, we cannot allow you to continue to violate the copyright policy. This policy has legal implications for our site and our reusers. Please review Wikipedia:Copy-paste and, if you are willing to follow proper policy and would like to continue contributing to Wikipedia, request an unblock. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kingston Defence

The article Kingston Defence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG because it lacks multiple reliable sources. Line not found in standard chess opening references. See also WT:CHESS#Kingston Defence.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 21:18, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kingston Defence for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kingston Defence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingston Defence until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 23:44, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Randolph for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Randolph is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Randolph until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:BTglobalServicesGrowth.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:29, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:WestCroft.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WestCroft.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:29, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:OakleyCourt.jpg

The file File:OakleyCourt.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused (see WP:NOTWEBHOST), unclear purpose

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 06:28, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fistral turn1.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fistral turn1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:21, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:MaxstokeCastle.jpg

The file File:MaxstokeCastle.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:UK IT market.jpg

The file File:UK IT market.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, unclear source/attribution/provenance, uploader has been blocked for copyright violations

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:ThegnL.png

The file File:ThegnL.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Low resolution image, unlikely to be used in future articles

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Esperanto (band)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Esperanto (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:10, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have converted this to a proposed deletion. If you are receiving e-mails and wish to contest, I suggest you edit this talk page and be sure to ping me. Espresso Addict (talk) 04:02, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:TDa.png

The file File:TDa.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Image unlikely to be used on Thames Ditton Lawn Tennis Club because of the incorporation of the date it was uploaded.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:15, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ashdell Preparatory School

The article Ashdell Preparatory School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Defunct, non-notable prep school

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:17, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peter Ellaway

The article Peter Ellaway has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet Wikipedia's current WP:NACADEMIC standards. He won an award but that is unverified, only reference is a co-authored paper.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:21, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mike Simpson (writer)

The article Mike Simpson (writer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:22, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:GravePamela.JPG

The file File:GravePamela.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Image of damaged gravestone, mentioned in Lady Edward FitzGerald but unlikely to be used in that brief article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:28, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]