User talk:Thegermans
March 2014
[edit]
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Bolton Wanderers F.C. without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mattythewhite (talk) 20:41, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Please stop changing the location of the Metropolitan Borough of Bolton and Bolton Wanderers F.C. articles to Lancashire from their correct location of Greater Manchester. Your persistent reverting of other editors corrections to your Vandalism will only result in your editing access being blocked. Richard Harvey (talk)
- Mr Harvey, 1) I am NOT a vandal. Do you know what the word means? If you did you would not have called me such an offensive name. 2) as I Boltonian I think I know where Bolton is. It is in Lancashire as ANYONE who was born there will tell you. 3) Who made you the thought police? Regards Adrian J German, Boltonian, Lancastrian, Englishman, Briton — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thegermans (talk • contribs) 6:54 pm, Today (UTC+0)
- I am quite aware of what the word means. In the context of Wikipedia it is a word that applies to people who incorrectly persists in replacing correct data in articles with incorrect detail and then continually revert corrections to their editing by other editors. Your persistence in changing the Geographic location of the Metropolitan Borough of Bolton and Bolton Wanderers F.C. to Lancashire from their correct location of Greater Manchester constitutes Vandalism. Bolton has not been a part of Lancashire since 1974. Your incivility in your message above is also not welcome on the project. Richard Harvey (talk) 10:13 pm, Today (UTC+0)
YOU HAVE THE CHEEK TO TALK ABOUT MY BEING UNCIVIL WHEN YOU HAVE A) REFRRED TO ME AS A VANDAL - WHICH I AM NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! JUST BECAUSE I AM AUTISTIC IS NO REASON TO BE RUDE TO ME B) YOU ARE NOT A BOLTONIAN SO KNOW NOTHING ABOUT BOLTON SO STOP MEDDLING IN THINGS YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT C) IF I HAD SAID WHAT I REALLY THOUGTH ABOUT YOU, WELL, ........ - BASICALLY YOU ARE A VERY RUDE MAN.
- I have moved the unsigned message you left on my talk page, shown above, here, for continuity.. Please note that I am not psychic and there unaware of your Autism. However that does not excuse your persistence in reverting multiple editors reversions of your editing to change the geographic locations of articles from its correct location in one county to another, that it is no longer a part of. Richard Harvey (talk) 10:48, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
actually it explains it perfectly.
firstly, I take great exception to anyone remotely being rude to me such as calling me a vandal
secondly, My approach to life is probably best summed up with "I may have my faults but being wrong is not one of them". So when I know I'm right, I know I'm right and no one (in a recent example, 4 men with machine guns could not dissuade me) can deflect me.
I think what we have here is like the story of the 2 knights who meet at a crossroads where a statue of a knight is situated. The first knight says the statue's shield is gold. the other knight, who had approached from the opposite direction said "no, it's bronze", where upon the fought and both fell mortally wounded by the other's lance
You are correct in that Bolton is a town who is governed by the metropolitan county of G Manchester I am correct in that Bolton is a town situated in the geographical (and ceremonial) county of Lancashire
If you were from Bolton you would abhor the term "Gretaer Manchester" (intentional mis-typing) as there is such a hatred in Bolton of things associated with Manchester United (a long history I won't bore you with)
I will revert the changes to my correct as the location of Bolton is more important in this context than who governs it
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thegermans (talk • contribs) 19:57, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Once again I have moved your reply to your own talk page for continuity. I won't bother to reply to it as clearly you have no interest in the guidelines of Wikipedia and are only grandstanding on a SOAPBOX for your own aims. Richard Harvey (talk) 00:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. only (talk) 11:40, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mkdwtalk 23:57, 16 March 2014 (UTC){{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 21:23, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
How, pray, is this any different from what has happened in totalitarian countries? Who made you the thought police? What gives you the right to interfere in something a) which you know nothing about b) does not concern you c) you have not taken part in and so do not appreciate that I consider this to be bully on your part and therefore a criminal offence? You DO NOT TREAT AUTISTIC PEOPLE THIS WAY - IT IS BULLYING AND MUST STOP NOW
Send me an email address and I will email you if you like, as this is not a tool equipped for the job — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thegermans (talk • contribs)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:19, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Thegermans (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
1) the website is factually incorrect in MANY ways I know I am a Boltonian and a season ticket holder at BWFC unlike those who are bullying me - and that includes you whoever you are - you have not even had the courtesy to name yourself which is a very weak thing to do. 2) I have been bullied by people on here - would it be acceptable to bully someone who was in a wheelchair or because of their race/creed/colour? I hope you would answer "no" and if you do then you have to accept the same with an autistic person 3) I know I'm right Thegermans (talk) 20:39, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your edit (and block) history shows that you are either unwilling or incapable of abiding by Wikipedia rules and guidelines. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:02, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thegermans (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
your rules say:
1. State your reason for believing your block was incorrect or for requesting reconsideration. It is not enough if you just say that the block was "wrong" or "unfair", or another user violated a policy first. You must explain why it was wrong to block you, or why it should be reversed. I HAVE DONE THIS 2. Address the blocking administrator's concerns about your conduct (the reason given for your block). As explained above, you have been informed about the reason for your block. You must address this reason in your request. This means that you must either explain why the block reason is incorrect or not applicable to your conduct, or you must convince the reviewing administrator that you won't do it again. I HAVE DONE THIS 3. Give evidence. If you state that you did or did not do something, or that the blocking administrator is missing something important, please provide brief details and a link in the form of a differential edit ("diff") if possible, or other evidence showing that you don't (or didn't) do what the block reasons states. I HAVE DONE THIS
YOU HAVE NOT TREATED ME AS AN INDIVIDUAL. YOU HAVE DISCRIMINATED AGAINST ME BECAUSE I AM AUTISTIC SO YOU ARE JUST AS GUILTY OF E.G.USING THE "n" WORD TO BLACK PERSON OR THE USING THE "s" WORD TO SOMEONE WHO CANNOT WALK - SO YOU ARE A BULLY. PLEASE READ MY NOTES ABOVE AND RESPOND. You need to state you name and your position and you need to respond to all my points OR YOU ARE GUILTY OF THE CRIME, YES CRIME, I HAVE OUTLINED
Decline reason:
You are blocked for disruptive editing, which is clearly beyond argument. You have not been discriminated against, merely treated as would be any other disruptive editor. Even if you are autistic you are required to behave in the same way as any other editor here. Please note that in an edit war whether you believe you are right or not is totally immaterial.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:44, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thegermans (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please state your name and address so I can contact the police regarding your illegal treatment of me OR answer my questions
Decline reason:
Not addressing block reason. You are possibly risking an indefinite block by threatening to contact the police, but I'm afraid that they would merely tell you that it was nothing to do with them anyway. Which it isn't. Peridon (talk) 18:50, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thegermans (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
you have still failed to answer my questions which is a) very rude b) I class this as cyber bullying. What is worse, you are continuing with your bullying by making threats about if I call the police. Your behavior is TOTALLY unacceptable and I have tried to be polite and reasonable but you continue to ignore my polite requests. Do you not understand that you are treating me in exactly the same manner as if you called a black person by the N word or a homosexual by the Q word. PLEASE answer my questions or provide me a name and address so I can contact the police as this IS cyber bullying if you do NOT acquiesce. Thank you
Decline reason:
Based on your rants, I see no evidence that unblocking you will have any benefit on the encyclopedia. For posting another frivolous unblock request that does nothing to address the actions that led to your block, your talk page access has been revoked. Kinu t/c 19:42, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.