User talk:Thefunnyjill

Welcome

Hello, Thefunnyjill, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- The Red Pen of Doom 20:39, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Fred: The Show, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Fred: The Show was changed by Thefunnyjill (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960506 on 2012-01-22T16:54:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:54, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Austin & Ally. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Austin & Ally was changed by Thefunnyjill (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907976 on 2012-01-23T01:40:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to List of Shake It Up characters, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:24, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Austin Mahone

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit on the page Austin Mahone was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Krenair ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:02, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for editing Wikipedia. Your edit on the page Austin Mahone was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to the Wikipedia. Thank you. Dontforgetthisone (talk) 20:24, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Laura Marano. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:28, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jake Short, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Denniss (talk) 22:31, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of Kickin' It episodes. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:06, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of Pair of Kings episodes. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 11:36, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Bella Thorne. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:18, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Austin singing Mistletoe in 2011.png

A tag has been placed on File:Austin singing Mistletoe in 2011.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 03:12, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another request for sources

I have again removed information you have added to Austin Mahone as you continue to add material to the article without providing any reliable sources for verification. It must be frustrating for you to have your edits reverted, so I'm not sure why you haven't taken the advice given to you in multiple messages on this page and simply state your sources when you edit the article. Note that ensuring that biographical details are sourced is Wikipedia policy, so please do either include the source or seek assistance if you're unsure how. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 18:12, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider this a final warning; if you continue to add unsourced personal information to biography articles you will be blocked from editing in order to ensure that you are both aware of and capable of following Wikipidia policy.--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 02:56, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of Pair of Kings episodes, you may be blocked from editing. You have previously been warned about adding unsourced content AussieLegend (talk) 07:13, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Content requires sources

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Austin Mahone, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- The Red Pen of Doom 20:25, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Again, in case you didnt understand the previous FINAL WARNING under stand, DO NOT CHANGE THE CONTENT OF THE ARTILCE UNLESS YOU HAVE AND INCLUDE A RELIABLE SOURCE that will allow other editors and readers to VERIFY the claim. (If the article has a source stating 800000 twits following him, you cannot change it to 900000 without providing a source to verify that change.)-- The Red Pen of Doom 00:14, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning:

Hi, Thefunnyjill. I'm an administrator who's been asked to evaluate blocking your account. It looks like you've experienced and caused a lot of frustration.

Please do not make any more edits to our articles without first gaining consensus for them from other editors on the articles' talk pages -- for instance, Talk:Austin Mahone. If you don't do this, I or another administrator will block your account without further discussion or warning.

Note for other admins: see this WP:AIV entry.

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:23, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have ignored multiple final warnings about adding unsourced content to articles including the above notice from an admin. If you persist in adding unsourced content YOU WILL BE BLOCKED. -- The Red Pen of Doom 17:34, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for continued addition of unsourced information despite multiple warnings and a final warning as well as a complete lack of communication when other editors have brought their concerns to your attention. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 00:01, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruption. Your first edit after your last block was to again add unsourced information to a BLP; this leads me to believe that you either do not understand the need to include sources and address the concerns of other editors regarding your edits, or you are simply disregarding the requirement altogether. The block is for an indefinite period, that is it can be lifted at any time if you agree to begin stating your sources when requested and to communicate with others in the spirit of collaboration that Wikipedia is based upon. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 16:20, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alex Constancio concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alex Constancio, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:25, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Alex Constancio

Hello Thefunnyjill. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Alex Constancio.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alex Constancio}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 11:00, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]