User talk:Thefactorygirl

Attacks in the article Samantha Spiegel

Warning

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Samantha Spiegel. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Regancy42 (talk) 06:17, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —SpacemanSpiff 06:35, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest at article Samantha Spiegel

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Samantha Spiegel, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 06:16, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Reich

Hi. I've had to remove the material you've added to the Alexis Reich article, as it came from a very distinct point of view, and Wikipedia is very strict about the need for neutral depictions. I'd suggest raising it on the discussion page for the article, as it would be worth getting input and assistance as to how best to approach it. - Bilby (talk) 08:09, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Samantha Spiegel for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Samantha Spiegel, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha Spiegel until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bad edits r dumb (talk) 09:17, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Reward 5 31 bolo1.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Reward 5 31 bolo1.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 09:22, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Samantha Spiegel. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:16, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Samantha Spiegel

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:17, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Samantha-John-Skype.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Samantha-John-Skype.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Eeekster (talk) 10:17, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Samantha Spiegel

Hi. Regarding this article, I have commented on the Talk page but I will repeat my comments here in case it gets deleted and you miss them...

You should not use Wikipedia to write articles about your own personal experience, for a number of reasons -

That is not the purpose of Wikipedia - it is an enclopedia, not a personal network thing, and only hosts articles about notable subjects.
It constitutes a Conflict of Interest, and it is very likely not to be written from the required Neutral Point of View

From what I read, I do sympathise with you over your experiences, but if any of the events are considered of suitable notability for an encyclopedia, the chances are someone else will eventually write about them - so you should really leave it for someone else to write from a dispassionate and neutral viewpoint.

I hope that makes some sense, best regards -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:31, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. From your prior comments How on EARTH am I to create a Wikipedia page about my experience? - please note that this is not what Wikipedia is for. Please create a blog if that is your goal. 7 11:38, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Old-Karr-Email.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Old-Karr-Email.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Bilby (talk) 11:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]