User talk:Theeditorofhistory

Welcome!

Hello, Theeditorofhistory, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Metcalvia, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Travelbird (talk) 13:12, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Metcalvia

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Metcalvia, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Travelbird (talk) 13:12, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Luanshya, you may be blocked from editing. Travelbird (talk) 13:13, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2010 Northumbria Police manhunt, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Travelbird (talk) 13:14, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:36, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theeditorofhistory (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

not a vandilism account,new and don't know how Wiki works yet, sorry : (

Decline reason:

Your claim that this is not a vandalism-only account is contradicted by the fact that you have zero constructive edits. I do not see how unblocking you would be beneficial to Wikipedia. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:36, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theeditorofhistory (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well Wikipedia is so hard to use, perhaps you should teach me instead of condeming me. Stupid Kinu, you're probably a right loner. Can someone else help me?

Decline reason:

None of your edits can be explained by the difficulty of using Wikipedia. They are clear expressions of malicious intent. Since you are using this talk page for personal attacks rather than constructive appeals for unblocking, your talk page access will be revoked. Favonian (talk) 10:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.