User talk:Thedude061899

Hello, Thedude061899, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:33, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

April 2015

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Edmonton Oilers. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:34, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Montreal Canadiens. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:48, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:53, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thedude061899, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Thedude061899! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Soni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Patrik Laine has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Patrik Laine was changed by Thedude061899 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964728 on 2017-01-08T08:49:21+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:49, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 13:26, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thedude061899 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As i said when i was blocked earlier tonight, I was drunk aand screwing around, an admin had already unblocked me. I dont see why I was blocked again

Decline reason:

Being drunk is no excuse. It's also not the case that an admin unblocked you. Your block log is publicly visible here and shows no unblock at this time. Yamla (talk) 14:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{Unblock on hold | 1=Ferret | 2= I understand that, I messed up. I apologize, i need to be more responsible. It wont happen again. also maybe Wikipedia was just glitching out because the ban notice disappeared at the top of my profile for a bit, I misunderstood that as the ban being removed. again sorry for being irresponsible and for the inconvenience it has created. | 3 = AGK ■ 22:44, 31 October 2018 (UTC)}}[reply]

@AGK: This block was in response to an AIV report and at the time all edits (since roughly 2015, with almost no edits until the Oct 2018 spree) appeared unconstructive. I'm fine with an unblock if you're satisfied with the user's apology and promises. -- ferret (talk) 23:29, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Thedude061899 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that, I messed up. I apologize, i need to be more responsible. It wont happen again. also maybe Wikipedia was just glitching out because the ban notice disappeared at the top of my profile for a bit, I misunderstood that as the ban being removed. again sorry for being irresponsible and for the inconvenience it has created.

Accept reason:

Your account has been unblocked. If you edit disruptively in future, you may be re-blocked without warning and with further requests unlikely to be considered. AGK ■ 15:25, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock discussion

What constructive edits might you make? Please give as much detail as you can. Because frankly, I could not find any constructive edits in your edit contribs, and I am disinclined to unblock.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:52, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You will, of course, need to affirm that you will lay off the sauce while editing. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:52, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I plan on keeping stats and what not updated on hockey pages, specifically pertaining to the Montreal Canadiens. And yes I can confirm I will lay off of the sauce whilst editing articles on this website. Like I said before, it was just a drunk joke inspired by seeing similar things done to make fun of hockey players. My apologies. Thedude061899 (talk) 08:50, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

^{[random irrelevant editor] Well I suppose no matter how bad the vandalism was, it's still gotta be better than doing something stupid in real life like driving, not that it (the vandalism) can be excused. 58.96.198.88 (talk) 10:48, 30 October 2018 (UTC)}[reply]