User talk:Thedionysianone

It is suspected or confirmed that this user has used one or more sock puppets for abuse, libel, or block/ban evasion.
See block log, list of suspected puppets and list of confirmed puppets.
The use of abusive sock puppets on Wikipedia is prohibited; use of sock puppets to evade bans results in the ban timer being reset and may further lengthen it.

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Rama's arrow 15:09, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Nirankari, you will be blocked. Matt J ^User|Talk 10:04, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The only vandalism here is the lies you are spreading as the truth. Don't desecrate people's religions.

Indira Gandhi

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please desist from adding the Khalistan links in, they do not qualify under WP:RS. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are going to blocked if you do not remove the Khalistan link. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:16, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The link will not be removed. You should not try to desecrate people's religions, and also try to hide the truth. That is not the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you do not desist from trying to intimidate people on this website, I will report you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Thedionysianone (talk • contribs)

That is your choice. Please read WP:3RR. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:37, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It has been reverted again. Are you going to persist? Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:21, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported you for your ongoing harassment.

You have been reverted again....Please read WP:NPOV and WP:SOAP...Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:39, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is unfortunate that Wikipedia does not have better administrators, who do not insist on ignorance.

That's your issue if you think that you are fair-minded. Have you reported me yet? Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue spamming, as you did in [[:Sikhism in Belgium]], you will be blocked from editing.Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:48, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For your information, you have already been reported. Fair-minded? Talk about yourself and your refusal to allow for relevant information, which is factual, from being posted. You are obviously the biased party, and an inappropriate representative for Wikipedia.

Have you tried reporting me at User talk:Jimbo Wales, the boss of Wikipedia? Blnguyen (bananabucket) 09:08, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We will consider doing that. You have already violated his order to you: NO CABAL 2. Newcomers are always to be welcomed. There must be no cabal, there must be no elites, there must be no hierarchy or structure which gets in the way of this openness to newcomers. - from Jimbo Wales User page.

In addition, it seems you are the kind of sycophantic second-hander, along the lines of Peter Keating, that Jimbo would certainly detest.

3RR

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

Also bear in mind that personal attacks and incivility are not accepted here. yandman 12:00, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your rules are not to be enforced according to a draconian, egregious methodology that violates the free dissemination of greater knowledge and truth. By citing the 3-revert rule, that's exactly what you are doing. If you do, then this militates against intellectual liberty, and the exposure of factual information regarding human rights abuses, which involve the entire international community.

This kind of fascism cannot be tolerated. And incontroveribly, it does not represent the Wikipedia ethic. If you have changed your values in favor of fascism, human rights abuses, and political correctness, then you are not educating the global community, but rather dumbing down the masses as transistorized automatons.

Once again, the name Rama's Arrow represents Hindu miltancy, and this must be construed as a personal attack against millions who are not Hindus. I think this is the kind of personal attack that should be most concerning to you, and Wikipedia must address this effectively.

As a result, it would not be "inappropriate," as you worded it, to summarily remove this block. Thedionysianone 00:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can use {{unblock}} if you want to appeal. Having said that, additions of yours like "* REALITY: To infiltrate all religions, sap their strength, and convert them via methods of mass hypnosis to this movement, in order to create a new diabolical religion."] to Nirankari are hardly going to do you any favours. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:32, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are countless disaffected members of this movement who would attest to the same, especially those who have intimate knowledge of the inner workings. Greater knowledge, awareness, and discussion of the facts would be highly favorable to the entire community. Thedionysianone 00:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well please read WP:V and WP:RS - information must be based one what has been verifiable reported and analysed by academics, not the "personal experience" of people who purport to have inner workings of this group. Also see WP:NPOV. If you persist in this manner when your block expires your stay here will not last long. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your persistence in making personal threats is truly outrageous. If you keep at it like this, you're the only one who will be looking stupid. There are multiple academics, and many erudite individuals who would agree that the movement relies on methods of mass hypnosis in its drive to create new converts, and making a religion of themselves, though this is officially denied. Thedionysianone 00:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I have no intention of banning you unilaterally, but you can carry on if you like and see how long you last. If you have sources which meet WP:RS, then by all means use them. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:51, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How long I last? What is that supposed to mean? It's amazing how ignorant you are. You are a disgrace to Wikipedia. Thedionysianone 00:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it means that if you continue violating policies, you will be banned. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:01, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple attempts have already been made to include verifiable truth and facts. Former President Bill Clinton wrote in his introduction to Former Secretary of State Madeline Albright's book, The Mighty and the Almighty, that "Militant Hindus Killed 38 Innocent Sikhs In Cold Blood." You repeatedly blocked this inclusion, despite this being a well-known FACT, verified by numerous human rights organizations. Thedionysianone 01:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your behavior is what is a violation of policy, and you are the one who should be banned. Just because you are not well-informed about the facts does not mean you have to be so arrogant towrd new users.Thedionysianone 01:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What policy am I violating? You are free to request that I be fired at WP:RFARB. I am not trying to intimidate you. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then you need to be more intelligent about not including relevant, verifiable information and facts, submitted by non-profit organizations of the United States, rather than ineffectually trying to harass and bully individuals on this website. Otherwise your website will be turning off many potential erudite individuals who wish to share their wisdom with the community. I am not sure that I will ever come back here, after the disgusting harassment that has been evinced here by yourself. Thedionysianone 01:13, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Extended block

Your block has been extended to one week. Please refrain from any more personal attacks or incivility. Your contributions and tone are entirely inappropriate for the Wikipedia. Please consider this your final warning. --Yamla 01:36, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You were caught using an IP address to avoid your block. Your block has been extended to 2 weeks. Please consider not violating Wikipedia's policies such as WP:SOCK during this time. --Yamla 04:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]