User talk:Thedarknight666
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Mansa Musa2.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Mansa Musa2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 18:40, 28 October 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 18:40, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Great Zimbabwe
[edit]Dark-Knight ... Many thanks for your interest - even though (as you will see) I have restored the text to its earlier version. We are of course always open to discussions on the GZim Talk-page. Regards, --DLMcN (talk) 11:37, 13 February 2013 (UTC) ... You have reverted the GZim article three times without responding to an invitation to discuss the matter. I have just repeated this invitation on the GZim Talk-page, and have also given a reason why I think my latest version is better. --DLMcN (talk) 09:46, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
February 2013
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Great Zimbabwe does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Dougweller (talk) 18:32, 17 February 2013 (UTC)