User talk:Thedarkknightli/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pretty Balanced albums

A tag has been placed on Category:Pretty Balanced albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwerfjkl (talk • contribs) 20:16, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Dolph Lundgren

Hello, Thedarkknightli,

Categories can not just be added by what an editor thinks is appropriate, they must all be supported by referenced claims in the body of the article. Do not add categories that can not be verified by the sourced article content. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:31, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

@Liz: Got it. --Thedarkknightli (talk) 17:32, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:21st-century Swedish activists

A tag has been placed on Category:21st-century Swedish activists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:32, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:21st-century Swedish chemists

A tag has been placed on Category:21st-century Swedish chemists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed a page deletion tag from Wikipedia. When removing deletion tags, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Thedarkknightli,

I guess you didn't read the notices that I posted on your talk page because they state Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. This mandate goes for any type of page you may create and for any speedy deletion criteria. If the categories are not longer empty, another editor will remove the tag. Please never remove another CSD tag from any page you have created. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

@Liz: Sorry. I won't do that again. --Thedarkknightli (talk) 20:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Brandon, Manitoba category issue and my apology

Hi, I am here to apologize to you because of the Brandon, Manitoba category issue. I restored all of the edits of the Brandon, Manitoba category by myself. I know you only speak Mandarin Chinese and you don't speak English. I am here to apologize on the category issue that I don't like. I hope you will accept my apology and I hope you will accept my edits after I restore the Brandon, Manitoba categories by myself. If you read this message reply me back to accept my apology so we will carry on. Anyways, I thank you and let me know to accept my apology. Thanks and have a great day. 2001:569:74D2:A800:D8D4:F81E:BCB5:11F1 (talk) 06:28, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

― Tartan357 ^Talk 04:09, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Donald Trump. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 04:10, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Rainer Werner Fassbinder

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rainer Werner Fassbinder. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 2003:D2:B716:5179:3C18:EE7F:463B:4408 (talk) 07:39, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Unsourced edit

Hello, I'm Yamla. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sammi Hanratty, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 17:19, 2 April 2022 (UTC)