User talk:Thecoolguy4ever

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Thecoolguy4ever, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Stephenie Meyer. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! John Vandenberg ^(chat) 23:39, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

Wikipedia does not include films in filmographies that have not begun filming, per WP:CRYSTAL. Please do not add them, as you have done several times. They will be only be removed, and it adds to the work load for the rest of us. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 14:50, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Please stop adding the film until it begins filming

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kristen Stewart. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 15:00, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Lots of people make that mistake. Happy editing! Cresix (talk) 15:15, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ashley Greene, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Ashley Greene was changed by Thecoolguy4ever (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-07-11T15:27:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:27, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

OK, now you're making it difficult to assume good faith. Please, no joke edits. Thanks. Cresix (talk) 15:30, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Speak Now, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. There needs to be source!!! It cannot come from fansites, message boards, or blogs. Only from places like Big Machine Records, official website, People Mag, Country Weekly, CMT, MTV, etc. Caldorwards4 (talk) 14:12, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

1. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Speak Now. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Yves (talk) 22:04, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

   Please refrain from making edits like this this. May I ask what your reasoning is for doing so? Removing sourced content is not really acceptable on Wikipedia, so unless you have a valid reason (which you should have stated in your edit summary), please do not make an edit like that again. Thank you. Yves (talk) 22:04, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Re: The release date in Ireland in nit as important as the worldwide one. No ne wants to know about that, they want the official worldwide release. Please stop editing unless you have something convicing Thecoolguy4ever (talk) 22:10, 15 October 2010 (UTC)thecoolguy4ever

The release date is sourced and "important", something which is not up to you to decide. How do you know now one wants to know about that? I think it's pretty important to the almost five million people in the Republic of Ireland, who would want to know. For albums on Wikipedia, we use the earliest release date, and for this album, this is the Republic of Ireland. Yves (talk) 22:27, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Speak Now, you may be blocked from editing. Yves (talk) 22:30, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. What you are doing is vandalism, and you may be blocked. Thank you. Yves (talk) 22:30, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

RE: Please, stop. Ireland isn't the only country in the world. If you are going to write the release date in your country, then I should write the release date in mine too, then everybody would write every release date for all the editions in all countries. It's not reasonable, and aside from that, didn't anyone ever tell you that you don't write the release date for any country and that you only write the worldwide release date? (By the way if you think that the Irish release date matters to the five million people in Ireland, believe me it matters much more for the eighty million in Egypt.) Please stop what you are doing, it's considered as vandalisim and you may be blocked from editting. Thecoolguy4ever (talk) 14:49, 16 October 2010 (UTC)thecoolguy4ever

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Speak Now, you may be blocked from editing. Yves (talk) 17:54, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. This is why a release history section is added (for example, The Fame Monster was released November 18, 2009 first in Italy and Japan, and that is the date that is used, and Animal was released January 1, 2010 in Denmark and Italy first, and that is the date to be used. Unless you want to be blocked, please do not remove the sourced addition again. Thank you. Yves (talk) 17:54, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Sorry to butt in here, but Yves is absolutely correct. The earliest release date is always the one that is used. See The Fame Monster as Yves indicated for an example of a chart that will be employed on the page when later releases in other countries are made. Also see I Am…Sasha Fierce for another example. Please respect the guidelines here and stop the disruptive editing, you are already in violation of 3RR from what I can see as you've made three reverted edits for the same thing. CycloneGU (talk) 23:52, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Breaking Dawn cast members in Rio de Janeiro.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Breaking Dawn cast members in Rio de Janeiro.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Andrea (talk) 02:54, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Re: The Twilight Saga: The Official Illustrated Guide

I'm more than happy to help with wording and such, but I haven't read The Guide and so I won't be much help in adding new information. Also just so you know, there is already a section in the Twilight (series) article that mentions controversy (here). Andrea (talk) 02:55, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Re: Twilight (novel)

"In-universe" is writing about fictional events/characters as if they are real, which is how most of your additions were written. There is some good, real-world stuff in there that you got from the Guide, like how Edward's personality is influenced by Meyer's. But most of it was just an extension of the plot summary, and sometimes actually an extension of the series' plot summary. The plot summary should be concise, which means only the key plot points should be mentioned. That doesn't include things like Alice's background, or how Emmett was changed into a vampire, and so forth. They don't affect the plot much, if at all, and that kind of information doesn't add anything that will help a reader understand the novel. Twilight is very strongly centred on Bella and Edward's relationship, as opposed to Harry Potter which creates a much larger world and has more characters who play important roles. Even the Twilight (series) page only has character descriptions for the 3 main characters. More detailed character descriptions are more suitable on the List of Twilight characters page (that's why we have it), though that article has its own set of problems—particularly that it has been tagged as in-universe for quite some time now. Personally, I don't think the Twilight (novel) page needs a "Characters" section at all, since the most important info that you'd need to know about the characters is covered in the plot summary. Edward and Bella both have their own articles for more detailed information. That being said, I'm not entirely against having a few main characters listed there, which is why I didn't remove the section completely (I also left James, since he is the main antagonist). I think the present descriptions should be shortened though—less of the fictional details and more real-world information. Andrea (talk) 05:01, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

I think adding "Themes" sections is a great idea. It's not always the easiest to find good, notable sources that discuss them though. That's why the section in the Twilight (series) article is so short, despite it being about all 4 books. I do like what you added to the Breaking Dawn page though. Do you have similar info for the other books? Andrea (talk) 16:06, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Thecoolguy4ever, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Thecoolguy4ever/sandbox. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:03, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Re: Bella Swan: character background

You're right, there is already a "Concept and creation" section—but that does not mean there should also be a "Character background" section. All you are doing is extending the plot (you should read the first item listed here). Just because the info is verified from other sources does not mean it's not primary information. There is nothing "real-world" about it, which is what would make it not in-universe. A quote from Meyer explaining the plot details does not make it real-world, since she is not explaining why she decided to write the character that way. Andrea (talk) 17:02, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Well no, because that would be explaining how one fictional character "influenced" another fictional character. Andrea (talk) 03:05, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Breaking Dawn cast members in Lapa Distrcit, Rio de Janeiro.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Breaking Dawn cast members in Lapa Distrcit, Rio de Janeiro.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:2347 5967939688.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:2347 5967939688.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:34, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:GUIDERevisedLogo-e1286320721387.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:GUIDERevisedLogo-e1286320721387.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:37, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Speak Now, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 02:10, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Red (Taylor Swift album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{cite web|url= http://www.allaccess.com/top40-mainstream/future-releases|title=Top 40/Mainstream > Future Releases – November 27, 2012|date=November 27, 2012|accessdate=December 5, 2012|publisher=
• club-celebrates-red-going-platinum-40000-copies-sold-in-brazil |publisher=Big Machine Label Group)| accessdate=July 3, 2014}}</ref>}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:15, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Shake It Off (Taylor Swift song), you may be blocked from editing. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 15:46, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Breaking Dawn cast members in Lapa Distrcit, Rio de Janeiro.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Breaking Dawn cast members in Lapa Distrcit, Rio de Janeiro.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Thecoolguy4ever. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)