User talk:Thechiv
December 2014
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:52, 12 December 2014 (UTC)Thechiv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Moderator was removing links and deeming them as spam without actually seeing how they would help the pages. I would add back and provide reasoning but mod would not provide any feedback for why I was wrong for adding links. The moderator would just continually deem them as spam. To make Wikipedia an overall better experience for contributors, mods should be trained on how to provide critical feedback to users who are actually trying to contribute rather than just providing a template response. To show I'm willing to be a valued contributor to the community, I will cease to add links from the site that were reported as spam and I will read through Wikipedia guidelines again. I will do my best to adhere to these guidelines this time around.
Decline reason:
Concur with Mr. Frenzy below; I see no significant edits that were not promoting a specific commercial entity. Seriously, the "providing examples" routine is old hat now. It may be more practical to outline the specific edits you will make in the future, and provide some indication that you understand why your additions were problematic. Kuru (talk) 02:26, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Comment: If you look at the short edit history, there is very little that doesn't seem to promote a commercial interest of some kind. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:10, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: I'm sorry if you feel that way. I'll try to contribute with material that won't be interpreted as commercial. Thechiv (talk) 01:18, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Draft:Magswitch concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Magswitch, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Magswitch
[edit]Hello, Thechiv. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Magswitch".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Magswitch}}
, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 05:50, 27 June 2015 (UTC)