Jump to content

User talk:Thechirogarage

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Randy Murrell

[edit]

My name is Randy Murrell, of Toronto, On, Canada. My email for communication is;. themysticgang@gmail.com This is regarding John Andrews Murrell. There has been recorded a third theory on his last days. Over the years, the limited number of Murrell as in Canada were located north of Toronto. We have some links that might be of interest, and should be considered for legitimate possibility. The mystery of the final outcome could have been created easily, once a headless man was buried in a position of 45 degree instead of east west normalcy. Here is what I can add to validate, or dismiss. One. There are carved initials in an old tombstone by a relative from mid to late 1800's, which my father insured I was aware of. The initials are, by coincidence J,A.M. Those initials have been there for at least my lifespan (60 yrs). My eldest cousin confirms there is a direct connection to J.A.M., and is the most reliable of historic of the Murrell family. My grandfather and father did have to go to Kansas to sell land, linking us to the major population of Murrells. John is the most common of the names at graveyard and living family. As a child, we were the only Canadians bearing the Murrell name in any city visited. With one exception, being located in Western Canada, and is a brother of my grandfather. There is an undisturbed picture sealed in glass since it was taken, in or around 1880 there or about. Resemblance is very much as pictures drawn of J.A.M., my brother of 70yrs in particular. I wonder if there is DNA records such as the thumb which may be his, I expect with the link to his thievery. I'd be totally into checking my own for proving the possibility. J.A.M. had the intelligence and connections to pull this off, and relocate, just like Jesse James was proven to have done. Ironically, the end of the underground railroad was in our area. He did have much support from the black community. So there definitely would be a means. Murrells stem back from Nordic history and it is not surprising to see his actions as it could be related to his possible Viking rape and pillage ways. I have never linked this to anyone, outside if family speculation and my eldest and elderly cousin validating it. How intriguing. Randy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:11A0:87E:21D6:E94C:BF72:17DB (talk) 07:01, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Thechirogarage, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 13:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Roaring Twenties, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Elliott and John Hamilton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bryan Forbes
added a link pointing to The Guns of Navarone
Cleopatra (1963 film)
added a link pointing to Peter Grant
George Mikell
added a link pointing to The Guns of Navarone

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited They Drive by Night, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Hamilton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Maltese Falcon (1941 film)

[edit]

Please be more careful to be accurate in your editing. The character's name is "Kasper", not "Casper". BMK (talk) 04:00, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Emory Parnell
added a link pointing to The Maltese Falcon
Miracle on 34th Street
added a link pointing to Robert Shaw

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Greatest Story Ever Told, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lazarus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Edit Summary#Always provide an edit summary

[edit]

Information icon Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 09:52, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Foreign Correspondent (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Burton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Point Blank (1967 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Bell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Finger Points, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Elliott. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frank Cady, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Father of the Bride. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dead End (1937 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Burke. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Passage to Marseille, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Loder. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adventure (1945 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Mitchell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Father's Little Dividend, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Billy Burke and Don Taylor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deborah Kerr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spectre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Separate Tables (film)
added a link pointing to James Hill
The Happy Thieves
added a link pointing to Virgilio Teixeira

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

A Spot of Bother (film)
added a link pointing to Robert Hale
Storm in a Teacup (film)
added a link pointing to Robert Hale
Waltzes from Vienna
added a link pointing to Robert Hale

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Capital letters

[edit]

One of the basic rules of the English language is that capital letters are used at the beginning of sentences, and for proper nouns (i.e. names), otherwise small letters are used. This differs from some other languages, such as, for instance, German, in which capital letters are used for many nouns. Please do not change small letters into capital letters where they are not required or appropriate, thankz. BMK (talk) 05:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford comma

[edit]

Please do not add the Oxford comma to existing articles. I looked at a few of your edits, and I would suggest that you do not make punctuation changes, as you seem to have some difficulty with punctuation. -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:06, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Our Manual of Style discusses the serial comma here. It does not require the Oxford comma, and it explains the alternative ways to avoid ambiguity. The MOS does, however, require that articles be internally consistent in their use or lack of use of the serial comma. So if an article does not use it, do not add it. I can assure you that you will run into trouble with other editors here at Wikipedia if you pointlessly try to change the style of established articles. You do not need to reply to this warning. -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:46, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Italics

[edit]

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:20, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop putting the word uncredited in italics. It is an improper use of italics per the MOS. Also you should not reinsert them after others have removed them as this is edit warring. Furthermore you should only edit under this account and not use IPs to make the same edits as that can be considered WP:SOCKing. Continued editing in this fashion can be seen as WP:DISRUPTIVE and can lead to a block. Your cooperation in this will be appreciated. MarnetteD|Talk 06:11, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited King Richard and the Crusaders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Douglas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hold Your Man, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Helen Freeman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, BUtterfield 8, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:47, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Thechirogarage. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BUtterfield 8

[edit]

Please note that, per WP:RS/IMDb, IMDb is not considered a reliable source and should not be used in citations. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 16:23, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Academy Awards

[edit]

Please do not change the names of Academy Awards in film articles - the categories have changed names over the years. If you're unsure, please consult the official database at this link.

Also, plurals are generally not formed by adding "apostrophe s" to names. There are a very limited number of circumstances where this is the case. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:58, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cast

[edit]

We are not IMDb, TCM, AMG, or the AFI catalog, and we do not regularly list every single credited actor in a film. If you have any doubt that this is true, I suggest you start a discussion about it on the talk page of the Film WikiProject. In the meantime, please do not revert again. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:29, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is what is on the screen during the ending titles. I think these names are important. Thechirogarage (talk) 19:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
They are not, they are simply the supporting cast, which -- in newer films especially -- can run into many, many names. It is not in our remit to list every cast member in a film, that's one reason we link to the cites that do. We only list the significant cast members. As I said, please confirm this with WikiProject Film if you believe I am incorrect. Beyond My Ken (talk) 12:56, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I respect your decision not to include these credited actors in this film, but I disagree with you. WikiProject Film suggests including cast members who are worth identifying, in named and speaking roles, and who are relevant actors, not just those who are prominent in the film. I agree that newer films list too many cast members to include in these lists, but older and classic films credit fewer actors. The history of even these smaller actors is important in these older films, lest they become forgotten. In All About Eve, these 10 additional credited actors are significant for this time period. Notably, Eddie Fisher and Eugene Borden should not have been left off this list.Thechirogarage (talk)(Thechirogarage (talk) 06:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC))[reply]
Borden is a bit player, and is not significant, but you're correct about Fisher. I've added a "cast note" about his appearance, we'll see if it sticks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 14:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ocean's 11, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Again, please do not add insignificant cast members to a film's cast list, as you did on Singin' in the Rain, unless there is a valid reason to do so. I have reverted your edit. The "man who Gene Kelly hands his umbrella to" (in the "Singin' in the Rain" number) is onscreen for less then 10 seconds and does not have a line. Further, AFI does not confirm Snub Pollard as playing the part, and IMDB is not a reliable source. Please use better judgment, or I'm going to have to bring your editing to the attention of admins. Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:08, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Saboteur (film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DonIago (talk) 03:52, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern. On Selmer Jackson's Wikipedia page, he is listed as an uncredited actor in the film Saboteur. This should be considered a relevant reference. Similarly, many films list uncredited actors without proper sources, but they can be referenced back to the actor's page. This should be considered as a preponderance of evidence, even if it is unsourced. If later proven to be wrong, they can then be removed. By being selective on what you feel is reasonable to stay and what should be removed seems to be capricious. I have helped to improve the relevance of the pages that I have edited, without malice. Also, your threat is unbecoming. Thechirogarage (talk) 17:45, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles are not considered reliable sources as discussed at WP:CIRCULAR; what should happen is that the entries at the actors' pages should have references added or be tagged for needing citations (or outright removed if they're considered that dubious). DonIago (talk) 13:50, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Vertigo (film), you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. There is no need to link actors in the body of text, when they are already linked in the Cast list. David J Johnson (talk) 13:07, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dub Taylor

[edit]

Please do not add the names of bit players with very small rolls to cast lists when actors who are billed above them aren;t listed. You've done this before, and now you're doing it to Dub Taylor. I wil be rolling back your edits. Please don't do this again, it's WP:DISRUPTIVE. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:24, 10 September 2017 (UTC) Sorry about that. I'll be more careful with my edits.(Thechirogarage (talk) 05:47, 12 September 2017 (UTC))[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Thechirogarage. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Saboteur (film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. As I believe you're aware, it is inappropriate to add uncredited roles to the Cast sections of film articles without providing a source to establish that the actor does in fact appear in the film. DonIago (talk) 16:28, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm General Ization. Your recent edit to the page Robert Morse appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. General Ization Talk 23:35, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ocean's 11. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Don't know why you're having so much trouble providing sources when you add information, but you've received multiple warnings for it, and it is galling that you continue to fail to provide them. DonIago (talk) 08:25, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

[edit]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956 film) plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:55, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Cleopatra (1963 film). You've received multiple warnings about adding information without providing sources, and yet you continue to do so. This needs to stop. When in doubt, err on the side of providing a source. DonIago (talk) 15:15, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I respect and understand your wishes. I will only add uncredited actors with a provided source. Thank you for your concern.Thechirogarage (talk) 16:45, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Thechirogarage. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Min and Bill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dorothy Jordan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Left Hand of God, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Chong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Inn of the Sixth Happiness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Chong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:17, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Blob, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elbert Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stagecoach. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. It looks as if you're preparing for an edit war. You have already been told that where there is a cast list, names of actors should not appear in the plot summary too. It's up to you whether you want your account blocked over this. Sweetpool50 (talk) 07:58, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thechirogarage&oldid=1258279531"