User talk:Thebyronbooker

This is Thebyronbooker's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Cyberdog958 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This submission is very promotional and full of peacock terms that will have to be removed and rewritten before it is submitted again. It also does not show that the subject is notable for an article. Reliable sources about the subject himself will have to be added to support that he is notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Thebyronbooker/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

cyberdog958^Talk 06:23, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thebyronbooker! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! cyberdog958^Talk 06:23, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Email about User:Thebyronbooker/sandbox

As I noted in the comment on the draft, all subjects have to show that they are notable enough to have an article written about them. All statements made in the article have to be supported by multiple, independent, reliable sources. The article you referred to in the email you sent me is not an example of a source that is enough of a significant coverage and is little more than a trivial mention. Also, as far as your interest in this article and your username, you appear to have a conflict of interest that must be declared before making any edits about subjects within that topic area. If you have any other questions, you can ask me or another user here on Wikipedia, or ask at the help desk, and preferably not through email, so that others can see the discussion and offer their opinion. cyberdog958^Talk 08:10, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Thank you, Thebyronbooker (talk) 20:01, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]