User talk:Thebestforever210

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Amanda Nunes, have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! S0091 (talk) 18:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

cool, I did this. So... yeah cool. I explained a logical reason why this happened. So thanks? Thebestforever210 (talk) 18:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hi Thebestforever210! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Amanda Nunes several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Amanda Nunes, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 19:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You might be right about Jon Jones but that issue needs to be taken up that article's talk page (Talk:Jon Jones) with sources that state he is the GOAT. What you believe is meaningless. It does state Jones has been widely considered to be the best pound-for-pound fighter in the world. The claim Nunes is the greatest is well-sourced so it should not be removed. All a Wikipedia article does (or should do) is summarize what have reputable sources have written about person, whether it be "true" or not. If you continue to remove the claim, you will likely be blocked. I am not saying that to mean or threatening, but it happens all the time here and I'd prefer that not happen to you. S0091 (talk) 19:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, nvm I forgot how uncredited wiki is, just read that 'goat talk' that apparently happened 2 years ago with your mod and others..

Yeah... y'all are sad. Nvm keep the post as an original in the lie of her being the female goat. Y'all don't care about sources, etc.. nah nvm gonna go to a credible site that is unbiased. This site is pathetic. Take care. Thebestforever210 (talk) 19:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jon Jones. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nswix (talk) 20:39, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should stop, sources say 'greatest', now before I start editing EVERYTHING that says 'greatest' leave it alone. Thebestforever210 (talk) 20:40, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Thebestforever210 reported by User:Nswix (Result: ). Thank you. Nswix (talk) 20:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:08, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My fault, thought y'all were impartial, but hit me with a ban when i provided sources, but the other guy is fine.

Sorry, I hurt your Boyfriend's feelings, maybe I should go date a Mod so i can have bias in my favor. 'Upload sources then edit' but don't do it to the people who sit on your lap? My fault. Well, I'll let y'all get back to sitting on one another's lap and gossiping about the ban. Sorry, for assuming you were impartial (because if you were, you'd ban the other for editing and reversing edits with no sources, not the person who provided sources and even stated facts.) Take care kiddos. Thebestforever210 (talk) 00:52, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]