User talk:Thebdj

Welcome!

Hello, Thebdj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Edcolins 08:04, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Spamming

You may start by adding the template {{spam}}--~~~~ in the user talk page. --Edcolins 08:00, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting vandalism

When reverting obvious vandalism, nonsense, or whatever, you can use "rvv" for the edit summary, to save time. It's short hand for "revert vandalism", and most people understand it. Anyway, keep up the good work. --Phroziac _. o º^{O (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!)} 16:10, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

I saw your note on my talk page! Yes, it is always nice to run across someone else on here from KY. I took a look at your talkpage, and COOL! You and I seem to have similar interests, both career-wise and hobby-wise. :) The Wookieepedian 21:56, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whose Line Is It Anyway?

I'm sorry, but you seemed to have removed an entry to the article. I saw the episode in question and I'm pretty sure of what happened. Please tell me your reason for removing it. --Acid Ammo 22:34, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that you wish to clean up the article/section. But I insist that my entry was valid. If the article is to be cleaned up correctly, the wrongful, misleading and minor entries should be retired. I belive my edit was neighter. It appears to me that you have seen the episode in question, so you should know. --Acid Ammo 01:47, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More Whose Line Is It Anyway?

I'm afraid I still don't agree; to allow two origins means the programmes are substantial different, which they clearly are'nt. I've posted on the topic discussion page. Cheers, DavyJonesLocker 01:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WhoseLine02.png

Hello Thebdj, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:WhoseLine02.png) was found at the following location: User:Thebdj/WL Games. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:18, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WhoseLine02.png

Thanks for uploading Image:WhoseLine02.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:48, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WCHS Ky Crest.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:WCHS Ky Crest.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PrincessBride05.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:PrincessBride05.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:50, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:WhoseLine05.png

Thanks for uploading Image:WhoseLine05.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:59, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of games from Whose Line Is It Anyway? for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of games from Whose Line Is It Anyway? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of games from Whose Line Is It Anyway? until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 00:08, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:WhoseLine01.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:WhoseLine01.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:41, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of games from Whose Line Is It Anyway? for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of games from Whose Line Is It Anyway? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of games from Whose Line Is It Anyway? (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- JohnGormleyJG (✉) 15:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]