User talk:Theassasin

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created. It is considered vandalism. janejellyroll 05:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please do not remove speedy deletion tags if you are the author of the article. It is considered vandalism. Please use the talk page if you wish to discuss the article. janejellyroll 05:23, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Go Girl (Book Series)

An editor has nominated the article Go Girl (Book Series) for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go Girl (Book Series). Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Go Girl (Book Series) during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Jayden54Bot 16:09, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Chronicles of Fatman

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article The Chronicles of Fatman, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jesse Viviano 05:37, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Betty Lew

A tag has been placed on Betty Lew, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Non-notable fictional character per here

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jeodesic 01:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Nar Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nar Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. –Gunslinger47 08:29, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:1569319006.01. SCLZZZZZZZ SS500 .jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:1569319006.01. SCLZZZZZZZ SS500 .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

Please note: this tag also applies to the other cover images used in List of Naruto chapters. EliminatorJR ^Talk 21:24, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]