User talk:The scar face

September 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Intelligent design, you may be blocked from editing. —Paleo Neonate – 05:36, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request to point out how I am violating the above mentioned policy.

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Dolotta (talk) 05:44, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Just a friendly reminder to sign your posts. Looking at your other contributions, it looks like you have the gist of the WP:POV. Dolotta (talk) 06:17, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting nothing concrete aside from being redirected to pages. Is there is mechanism to ensure editors with more priveleges substantiate accusations against new users? --The scar face (talk) 06:27, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The wonderful people at the WP:TEAHOUSE should be very helpful answering your questions. I'll send a welcome your way with helpful links for you. Dolotta (talk) 06:34, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, The scar face! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Dolotta (talk) 06:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hello, and a Question

Hello, Scar Face. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. I'm sorry to see that a conflict has sprung up. I noticed your post over at WP:ANI. As I'm trying to understand the history of the dispute, I noticed that there are a few anonymous edits. Before you got your user name, were you the editor who did this edit trying to make the lead sound more neutral: [1]? Alephb (talk) 09:51, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, for not clarifying properly. Yes, I made the edit. I created an account, because multiple use this IP, and so I wished to keep that separate from the account. --The scar face (talk) 09:55, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3RR overriding policies

Those are explicitly listed in the Exemptions section. Other policies aren't exempt. Doug Weller talk 13:22, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Intelligent design

You've been warned for edit warring per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. You are risking a block if you revert again at Intelligent design without first getting consensus in favor of your change on the talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:14, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]