User talk:The man from OZ

Welcome!

Hello, The man from OZ, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 11:40, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help me out Ozzy

Can you help me archive my stuff? talk to me when you get this and I will explain it.

09:21, 13 February 2006 (UTC)Licinius

Archive 1

You created an article called Archive 1, which I deleted. It was some sort of long discussion, but I have no idea what article or user it belongs to, so I deleted it for now. Academic Challenger 09:26, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I put the information in the right place. What you did was the right policy but you also had trouble with the process. Archive 1 is not a specific enough title because it could be an archive of anything. The correct title is User talk:Licinius/Archive 1. I fixed it. Academic Challenger 09:42, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Royal National Park & Woronora Dam

These two already existed so I changed Royal National Park, New South Wales and Woronora Dam, New South Wales to redirects as per standard of not having duplicat articles. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 05:42, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you just forget to log in and post as 60.225.200.50? CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 08:36, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem I have ended up being logged out several times under multiple IP's. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 08:43, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vote is on for footy

Footy vote is on. Show those who tried to insult us and who have in my opinion a flagrant disrespect and laissez-faire attitude to wikipedia policy what is up. --Licinius 05:47, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grant65

Apparently according to that AFL wanker, you are my sockpuppet and he has said as much on your userpage. I will let you rip into him when you get this. --Licinius 05:56, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, I'm scared. Very un-Wikipedia language there from Licinius. Matey, you can't remove the suspected sockpuppet tag until it is proven that you aren't a sockpuppet. As I said to one of your buddies, you can do the same thing to me, but you don't have any evidence that I use sockpuppets. Because I don't. Grant65 | Talk 08:51, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Poll

New footy poll on talk page at bottom. --Licinius 05:05, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sockpuppet tag

Removing these is regarded as a form of vandalism. You need to wait for it to be investigated. If you are innocent you have nothing to worry about. Grant65 | Talk 09:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is a shame that the request for checkuser is taking so long, I realise that being accused of being a sockpuppet is annoying, especially if you aren't one! It would be best though if you could just be patient and wait for the result. It's a bit like an article going up for WP:AFD, some good articles get nominated for deletion, and whilst it might look bad for a while the article still survives :)

As for your second message, I'm not sure that I've ever actually accused you of vandalism. If I think someone is a vandal I will warn them by leaving a message on their talk page (usually using one of the standard warning templates). As far as I can see I've never edited your talk page before. I do realise that my message to Grant65 I did use the word 'vandalism', however that wasn't directed specifically at you. To be honest I can't remember that far back to what specific edits by whom that was referring to, but please be assured that I'm not accusing you of vandalism. I also note that you haven't been blocked, unlike some of the other users in this case. Anyway, as always, when being accused of doing 'bad things' just make sure all your edits are of the highest standard, and you will be fine. Petros471 12:57, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]