User talk:The machine512

Welcome!

Hello, The machine512, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Rabid Monkeys Eat Grass 03:35, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Netrek.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Netrek.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:11, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3rr / GW

Just to make sure you are aware of WP:3RR. On the subject of GW, may I suggest that rather than making huge changes and getting offended when people don't like them, you try some rather more minor changes first William M. Connolley 09:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I am aware and did abide by it. The only change I made was adding "neutrality check" tag, as I believe this article does need attention regarding adequate expression of the minority view. Which apparently I am unable to fix due to unwarranted reversions.

Watch out for William, he doesn't believe in abiding by WP:OWN on GW and has admin powers to back himself up. Kyaa the Catlord 14:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. :) Will do. The machine512 14:59, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Global warming article

Thanks for your support of my comments at the Featured article review for Global warming. Would you have any interest in posting a few of your comments in the mediation page? It is at Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-03-25 Global warming‎. The one thing which really matters in a mediation is having not a multitude of voices, not just one or two voices on each side.Without that, the whole mediation may not get much attention. So if you;d like to post anything, we'd sure appreciate it. Please feel free to write to me anytime. Thanks. See you. --Sm8900 18:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:HowardJones.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:HowardJones.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, The machine512. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tim Patterson

The article Tim Patterson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can find in-depth coverage in only one independent, secondary, reliable source (see Talk page). Does not seem to meet other WP:NPROF criteria.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 05:39, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tim Patterson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tim Patterson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Patterson (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 15:35, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]