User talk:The comings and goings

Chemoreceptor edit and Frontiers journal

I made this edit removing the Frontiers journal as a source because the content was off-topic for the discussion, was based mainly on primary research and speculation, and Frontiers journals are suspect for low-quality editorial or predatory practices, as discussed in the disclaimer at WP:CITEWATCH. I think this is plentiful justification for removing the Frontiers article as a source. Zefr (talk) 18:40, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! But I was somewhat confused as you and User:Headbomb are all excellent and experienced editors. Do you have any recommendation? Thanks again. --The comings and goings (talk) 18:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

My only response is that please stop fishing. I am strongly interested in your motive. Are you planning to run for an adminship or any achievement? I respect your dream so long as it is in line with the purpose of Wikipedia, otherwise it could constitute WP:disruptive behavior. I believe either you or admins deserves better than this mess. Here are my best wishes. Period. --The comings and goings (talk) 18:56, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The comings and goings (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't know Wikipedia has become a paradise of fishing.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:18, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.