User talk:The brig

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, The brig, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 11:38, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Group One wins

Hi, I've noticed you've added a few wins in the King's Stand Stakes from the period when it was a Group Two race to various jockeys' and trainers' articles, e.g. Geoff Wragg's win with Cassandra Go in 2001. Do you think maybe its best to just restrict the list of wins to G1 races when they actually held G1 status? Anyway, it's good to see someone editing flat racing articles, as it isn't an area which is terribly well-covered on here at the moment - I'm more of a jumps enthusiast myself but trying to keep the flat race articles up to date.--Bcp67 (talk) 19:19, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know what you mean about the King's Stand, but it was also a Group 1 between 1973 and 1987. Now that it's been restored to its former glory, it would be strange to include some and not others. We've sort of done the same with races like the Haydock Sprint Cup, Golden Jubilee Stakes, Prince of Wales's Stakes, Sun Chariot and so on. All races that have become group 1s. I try and keep the flat up to date, but rarely have the time to do as much as I'd like. Like you, I slightly prefer NH. Would like to see NH trainers and jockeys on Wiki with updated Grade 1 wins in the UK and Ireland at least, but appreciate it would be a long old job. The brig (talk) 20:31, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Still not convinced about this! E.g. you've noted Piggott winning the Prix d'Astarte (now Rothschild) in 1979, but it was only a G3 race then. How about noting that the race didn't carry the same status as it does now? Should we also record that Piggott won the Flying Childers in 1973 and 1974 when it held the G1 status which it subsequently lost? --Bcp67 (talk) 21:16, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I know what you mean, and you're probably right. I guess that I want people to be able to set today's major races in some sort of context - ie that people should be aware that Piggott, Eddery, Fabre and so on have actually won these races that are Group 1s today, albeit at a time when they were more lowly cnsidered.

So many of today's G1 races have been promoted to that status, including such as the Queen Anne and the Prince of Wales that are now regarded among the Crown Jewels, that it's hard to know exactly what is the right course of action. However, with the exception of the King's Stand, not many yo-yo between G1 and G2 status. Today, I imagine that people want to know who has won what are the great races of the day.

The Flying Childers, which you cite, has lost a lot of its lustre over the past 40 years or so, and it no longer figures at the top of people's thoughts, I don't suppose. On the other hand, your idea of some sort of asterisk about changes in races' status has plenty of merit. The only trouble is that one might end up with a lot of sub-clauses in each profile that might only serve to confuse. If you can see a nice, tidy way of approaching the problem, I'd be more than happy for you to apply it!

Good of you to take the trouble to write - your ideas always seem to make plenty of sense. The brig (talk) 14:38, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation at User:The brig/sandbox. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —SMALL JIM 19:50, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

McCoy's winners

Hi - you've reverted my change of earlier to put McCoy's winners back to 4,046. Apologies for that - I'd always assumed that his total and landmarks referred to Britain only, but I can see it's Britain and Ireland - only a very small number in Ireland anyway. Cheers! --Bcp67 (talk) 20:05, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No worries at all; I was just updating as he went along! He had another winner in Ireland today, so as of now he has 3,916 in Britain and 130 in Ireland, making a total of 4,046. Thanks for keeping me on my toes - I guess I'm just trying to ensure that such a brilliant sportsman has a constantly updated log of his achievements. Hopefully, others, including you will also keep it going. Cheers!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/François Mathet concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/François Mathet, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/François Mathet

Hello The brig. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "François Mathet".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/François Mathet}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hasteur (talk) 22:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tony McCoy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albert Bartlett Novices' Hurdle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, The brig. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]