User talk:The Unique One v2.0
Welcome!
[edit]Hi The Unique One v2.0! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing!
April 2021
[edit]
Hello, I'm Robynthehode. I noticed that you recently removed content from Intelligent design movement without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Robynthehode (talk) 11:15, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021
[edit] Hi The Unique One v2.0! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at CNN that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. --Renat 07:39, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hi. I have corrected this edit with a more accurate term. The Unique One v2.0 (talk) 22:19, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
[edit]
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:CNN. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
- It may not have been the most helpful thing in the world, but it's also not appropriate to remove it. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
- It isn't me who actually removed credible content. @ValerianB and @soibangla have been removing reliable information obtained from reliable sources (Pew, WaPo). Please reprimand them or prevent them from doing the same. The Unique One v2.0 (talk) 15:46, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
- This particular message isn't about the article but about this edit to the talk page, where you removed someone else's comment. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
- That must have been a mistake. Can I undo it? The Unique One v2.0 (talk) 16:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
- Aha. Yeah that happens once in a while when you get an edit conflict. No need to do anything at this point. I already restored it. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:17, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
- Okay thanks The Unique One v2.0 (talk) 16:24, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
- Aha. Yeah that happens once in a while when you get an edit conflict. No need to do anything at this point. I already restored it. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:17, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
- That must have been a mistake. Can I undo it? The Unique One v2.0 (talk) 16:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
- This particular message isn't about the article but about this edit to the talk page, where you removed someone else's comment. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
- It isn't me who actually removed credible content. @ValerianB and @soibangla have been removing reliable information obtained from reliable sources (Pew, WaPo). Please reprimand them or prevent them from doing the same. The Unique One v2.0 (talk) 15:46, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert for gender, abortion and American politics
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 16:34, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:History of the Malayalam Language
[edit] Hello, The Unique One v2.0. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:History of the Malayalam Language, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)