User talk:The Unforgiven One
Contact me here!
Regarding your user page and user talk page
[edit]You originally created them at User The Unforgiven One and User talk The Unforgiven One respectively, but you forgot the colon, so they were classified as articles. I added the colon to both and tagged the original ones for deletion. Happy editing! Logan Talk Contributions 01:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
MfD nominations and other edits
[edit]Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. I've noticed your recent MfD nomination, and your other recent edits. I'd like to remind you to that Wikipedia is intended to have a friendly and welcoming community, writing neutral articles. Wikipedia isn't a battleground. In particular, users are given wide leeway in the content allowed on their userpages. For more information see WP:USER. The userboxes you have nominated for deletion lie within what is generally acceptable. Also, I'd like to remind you that promoting a particular point of view isn't permitted on Wikipedia, as it tends to foster the kind of competitive attitude we'd like to avoid. Based on the content of your userpage, I think you should focus your efforts on improving articles rather than trying to fight a perceived foe. Doing the latter tends to be disruptive to the Wikipedia process. Feel free to ask any questions, Prodego talk 00:10, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Completely new abortion proposal and mediation
[edit]In light of the seemingly endless disputes over their respective titles, a neutral mediator has crafted a proposal to rename the two major abortion articles (pro-life/anti-abortion movement, and pro-choice/abortion rights movement) to completely new names. The idea, which is located here, is currently open for opinions. As you have been a contributor in the past to at least one of the articles, your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated.
The hope is that, if a consensus can be reached on the article titles, the energy that has been spent debating the titles of the articles here and here can be better spent giving both articles some much needed improvement to their content. Please take some time to read the proposal and weigh in on the matter. Even if your opinion is simple indifference, that opinion would be valuable to have posted.
To avoid concerns that this notice might violate WP:CANVASS, this posting is being made to every non-anon editor who has edited either page (or either page's respective talk page) since 1 July 2010, irrespective of possible previous participation at the mediation page. HuskyHuskie (talk) 20:51, 4 July 2011 (UTC)